Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: Broner Not That Good, Not Good For Boxing

[deanrw]

Paulie should be very careful about how he talks about other fighters. He has a day job where he is supposed to be fair and impartial. His current line of talk could cause him future problems.

[itsafight]

i didnt see the fight but I thought floyds boner looked pretty legit the 2 fights i saw at 135. maybe hes just not a welterweight. Kind of like when I bulked up 2 heavyweight. Yeah u can do Ok but its just not the same as being ur natural weight.

lmao lightweight ain't his natural weight! He's got a huge frame even for welterweight. I wonder what the dude rehydrates to.

[b0ndsj0ns20]

He's completely right. Broner isn't that good and didn't look nearly as good against Paulie as Khan, Cotto, and even a past his prime Hatton did. Quite frankly if Broner was as good as he thinks he is he should look good against Paulie. If you are a great fighter you handle Paulie, and if you aren't you struggle with him. Broner won, but he did not look good doing it.

[4Eyez26]

How can you say what pualie said or what his intentions were. You have no idea. all i know is they talked**** to each other the whole fight.

Broner answered Jim Gray's question, same way paulie did when everyone got mad when Jim asked paulie about "biting the hand that feeds you". did broner have to answer that way-no. was talking about taking his girl classless-yes.

but be honest-this is the same rant paulie went on after the diaz fight and diaz said nothing of the sort. Or was that diaz fault?

the people who think he lost are just fishing for something to whine about. he clearly and fairly beat paulie.

No one is arguing against this, the point is a judge scored the fight 117-111.

Broner DID NOT win in such fashion. Maybe a round or two at MOST. Close fight.

[billeau2]

Paulie should be very careful about how he talks about other fighters. He has a day job where he is supposed to be fair and impartial. His current line of talk could cause him future problems.

Maybe thats discretion to you...but its censorship to many. Paulie's outrage was a combo of Bronner's lack of sportsmanship and the wide margin of the last judge. A margin like this is arrogant, it shows influence because it is so out of line. Boxing fans accept this crap and nobody says a thing and thats wrong.

Bronner is a classless idiot and that is embarrasing as well. I actually liked the way the guys promoted the fight...you promote hard, fight hard kiss and make up haha. Mayorga who talks great trash always apologizes after the fight. What Bronner did was to violate that relationship and he did this because he was upset...why? because essentially he was hit a lot, could not chase Paulie down and hurt him.

The fact of the matter is that Bronner has been exposed. The first decent puncher he faces with a little mobility will destroy him. A case could be made that Paulie beat him. Why do people assume Bronner's punches were harder? I mean Paulie did not look shook by anything Bronner threw.

[periks19]

paulie a loud mluth punk. he's lucky to even get these type of fights.

Umm he was the champion so lucky??? Mmm lucky briner to find a weak 147 title holder

[HanzGruber]

Not good for boxing? Boxing needs an entertainer. His post fight was hilarious. He's like a more obnoxious prince naz. And if he keeps winning hell just get more hate

[flint]

Crybabynaggi needs to shut up and move on. Boxing did win and you lost. Broner won the fight because the judges scored it that way.so broner gets the win and he took your girl. Man up and move on you cry baby.

[The Big Dunn]

No one is arguing against this, the point is a judge scored the fight 117-111.

Broner DID NOT win in such fashion. Maybe a round or two at MOST. Close fight.

agree with you 100%. terrible score.

[Gatling]

he is good for boxing. But I agree. He isn't THAT good. Certainly not the next Mayweather.