i didnt see the fight but I thought floyds boner looked pretty legit the 2 fights i saw at 135. maybe hes just not a welterweight. Kind of like when I bulked up 2 heavyweight. Yeah u can do Ok but its just not the same as being ur natural weight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: Broner Not That Good, Not Good For Boxing
Collapse
-
-
How Is Mags ANY BETTER For Boxing? Foul Mouth, Vulgar, Loud Mouth Italian
Broner is a punk, and so is Paulie Mags. Play the tape back... all that ****** pre fight trash talk between those fools over girl names and their girlfriends, then turning it into a slobfest of vulgarities, and sloppy girlfriend seconds, that the media listened to. That has nothing to do with Boxing. So the only thing Mags can hang his hat on is he lost decisions to Cotto, Khan and Broner, and still hasnt' beaten anyone. Broner is a classless punk in every sense of the word. So Paulie has all these sour g****s post fight, he did nothing in the ring he promised. Broner doesn't have 147 power. Neither one of these guys are good for Boxing, so lets stop talking and reporting anything about these guys. I'm tired of hearing these idiots talk all this trash, what they are going to do to their opponent, then make it personal, and condescending, as well as vulgar, then underperform. Mags you're an idiot, just like Vinnie Pazienza was.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dawghouse11 View PostMaybe Paulie can now give Keith Thurman a try now the he himself has been reduced to "co-mainevent money" by a lightweight. Come on Paulie show us how average Thurman is. haha
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoubleMM View Postpaulie lost and made an outragous claim that a judge was paid off. paulie is a sore loser and a punk who got his ass beat by a small guy nmoving up 2 weight classes.
paulette only gets fights because he comes to the ring like a clown and has an italian following. otherwise he's a **** fighter.
As to Broner being a small guy moving up, I didn't see a great deal of difference in their size. If Malignaggi is such a **** fighter how come Broner didn't stop him?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostNew York judge scores it against a New York fighter in NY by the widest margin of all three judges, that's not exactly a usual occurrence in boxing.
As to Broner being a small guy moving up, I didn't see a great deal of difference in their size. If Malignaggi is such a **** fighter how come Broner didn't stop him?
so because of that say you lost fighy because judge was bought? if broner lost then said that broner would never hear end of it ever
Comment
-
Originally posted by NatiKid View Postso because of that say you lost fighy because judge was bought? if broner lost then said that broner would never hear end of it ever
If you don't like what Paulie's saying then blame Broner, he was the one who broke the unwritten fighter's code of showing respect post-fight. Even FMJ wouldn't have gone down that road.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostMalignaggi wouldn't have said ish until Broner took a cheapshot in his interview, he didn't have it in him to be respectful. After that why should Malignaggi hold back?
If you don't like what Paulie's saying then blame Broner, he was the one who broke the unwritten fighter's code of showing respect post-fight. Even FMJ wouldn't have gone down that road.
Comment
-
Broner is a prick. His comments in the post fight interview were classless. He's a good fighter but he showed that he can easily be outworked. He's gonna have a hard time with someone who hits harder but has a good work rate like Paulie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostPaulie said the same thing about politically connected fighters before and after the fight. It wasn't broner's fault.
Broner just made it worse for himself because now in addition to underperforming a lot of people think he is (a) a POS and (b) benefactor of a corrupt decision.
Comment
Comment