Originally posted by hitking
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” — How Much Credit Does Broner Deserve?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostI agree, too many "robberies". IMO the very best Paulie could get was a draw, and that'd be very generous. But, I think this is pretty much his best case scenario, he won the event lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostHonestly, there's really nobody screaming robbery outside of the diehard Broner haters. I've read nothing from any of the boxing writers that thought Paulie won. And most had Broner winning 116-112 or 117-111. Like you basically said, there were enough competitive rounds (I won't say close rounds because to me, Broner landed the clearer, more effect punches in every round) that if you you were rooting really hard for Broner to lose, you could have a very close scorecard. But the reality is, AB won a comfortable UD. Very similar to the Floyd-Cotto fight.
Even though you didn't say this but just so you know prime Cotto that fought a prime Paulie (and gave him the beating Broner promised but couldn't deliver) would have broke Broners ribs.Last edited by torosboxing75; 06-24-2013, 03:27 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by torosboxing75 View PostDon't ever compare Cotto to Paulie two completely different fighters in every way.
Even though you didn't say this but just so you know prime Cotto that fought a prime Paulie (and gave him the beating Broner promised but couldn't deliver) would have broke Broners ribs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostSo are you saying Paulie was landing meaningful connects with regularity?
Anyhow, Malignaggi was landing all night, not necessarily hurting Broner (only he can tell you that), but imo they were scoring shots regardless.
Again I didn't have Paulie winning (scored it a draw) but could see a case for him winning depending upon how you score a fight. I lean more towards Broner winning and it was no robbery although Broner is fortunate to once again get the close rounds in an opponent's backyard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostDefine "meaningful"? In doing so you'll fall into the realm of subjectivity. When is a scoring shot not a scoring shot...when it's thrown to the body by Paulie Malignaggi appears to be the answer of some.
Anyhow, Malignaggi was landing all night, not necessarily hurting Broner (only he can tell you that), but imo they were scoring shots regardless.
Again I didn't have Paulie winning (scored it a draw) but could see a case for him winning depending upon how you score a fight. I lean more towards Broner winning and it was no robbery although Broner is fortunate to once again get the close rounds in an opponent's backyard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View Postbroner deserves as much credit as cotto, hatton, and khan did.
why is this even being discussed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tyotfo View PostAnyone who had Broner on their pound for pound lists can now remove him.
I marvel at how everyone speaks poorly of Broner's performance as if Paulie laid down the entire fight. Broner had a "live dog" in front of him who actually came to fight, something we have not seen from Broner's previous opponents except Ponce De Leon. Unlike Broner's previous opponents, Paulie wasn't flat footed, slow and intimidated. Broner will be just fine. I really hope he does fight Maidana next as many people here are calling for this match up. Maidana IS slow, flat footed and MUCH easier to hit. This will shut the mouths of the nay sayers :-)
Having said all of this I'm not convinced that Broner did enough to take Malignaggi's title. The fight should have been a draw at best.
Comment
Comment