Was Paulie The Victim of a Fixed Fight Robbery?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • F!x
    It's In!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2013
    • 2066
    • 124
    • 40
    • 38,324

    #1

    Was Paulie The Victim of a Fixed Fight Robbery?

    Paulie accused one of the judges to be on Al Haymon's payroll, essentially meaning that he thought at least one judge was fixed in Broner's favor. This judge, Tom Schreck, scored the fight 111-117 which was wildly different to the other two judges 115-113 Broner 115-113 Paulie.

    Do you think Paulie was robbed through the actions of a planted judge as he implied himself in post-fight interview - or was the anomalous scoring by Schreck just the actions of a poorly trained / under-qualified / inattentive boxing judge?
    31
    Yes - Tom Schreck's 111-117 score is highly suspicious
    61.29%
    19
    Just incompetent, poor judging - - it happens sometimes
    12.90%
    4
    No - Tom Shreck's 111-117 was totally justifiable
    22.58%
    7
    Other
    3.23%
    1
  • LeG00N
    All Time Great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 20386
    • 1,081
    • 1,364
    • 25,738

    #2
    yes definitely ...

    Comment

    • Sammy2g3
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 416
      • 54
      • 115
      • 7,228

      #3
      GTFOH!!!! Easy fight to score. Broner won!!!

      Comment

      • DoubleMM
        hoodrat idiot gold tooth
        • Dec 2009
        • 2998
        • 407
        • 36
        • 36,691

        #4
        no, everyone had Bronner winning. Paulis was doing nothing all fight but hitting elbows and gloves. Paulie is lucky he has an italian demograhpic following him or else he would never even be televised.

        Paulie is a loud mouth punk who made an outrageous claim that a judge was payed off when he clearly lost the fight. A sore loser who should lose his job.

        Comment

        • Mike D
          Abnormal Human Being
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2012
          • 13069
          • 1,747
          • 2,352
          • 73,360

          #5
          Originally posted by F!x
          Paulie accused one of the judges to be on Al Haymon's payroll, essentially meaning that he thought at least one judge was fixed in Broner's favor. This judge, Tom Schreck, scored the fight 111-117 which was wildly different to the other two judges 115-113 Broner 115-113 Paulie.

          Do you think Paulie was robbed through the actions of a planted judge as he implied himself in post-fight interview - or was the anomalous scoring by Schreck just the actions of a poorly trained / under-qualified / inattentive boxing judge?
          Nah. I was pulling for Paulie but it was pretty clear that Broner had a biblical edge when it came to clearer, more powerful (significantly more powerful) shots. Paulie was game but man, he's just got absolutely no power or pop on his punches. If he was born with a little bit more power he could have won it but alas, it wasn't meant to be for him.

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31092
            • 1,459
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #6
            Originally posted by DoubleMM
            no, everyone had Bronner winning.
            No they didn't.

            Moreover, Broner got away with kidney shots, kicking Paulie in the nuts and upper-cutting him on the break with no points taken.

            Comment

            • El Angel
              Team Cotto
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 20795
              • 495
              • 382
              • 29,430

              #7
              No, he clearly lost. 117-111 is wide, but not enough to say the fight was fixed. I'm surprised he got a SD TBH, he fought with passion, he just didn't have the fire power.

              Comment

              • itsafight
                Banned
                • May 2013
                • 683
                • 41
                • 23
                • 846

                #8
                Strong username to thread title correlation.

                Comment

                • Kagami Taiga
                  Generation of Miracles
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 19078
                  • 703
                  • 228
                  • 40,183

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Weebler II
                  No they didn't.

                  Moreover, Broner got away with kidney shots, kicking Paulie in the nuts and upper-cutting him on the break with no points taken.
                  The media had it overwhelmingly for Broner. Just about everyone has him winning. This forum is just ass backwards

                  Comment

                  • Weebler I
                    El Weeblerito I
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 31092
                    • 1,459
                    • 1,648
                    • 54,550

                    #10
                    Originally posted by DempseyRollin
                    The media had it overwhelmingly for Broner. Just about everyone has him winning. This forum is just ass backwards
                    Bro this is where the hardcore boxing fans post, the actual fans of the sport not the media making money off it - on this and on other forums I'm reading the same things.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP