Paulie accused one of the judges to be on Al Haymon's payroll, essentially meaning that he thought at least one judge was fixed in Broner's favor. This judge, Tom Schreck, scored the fight 111-117 which was wildly different to the other two judges 115-113 Broner 115-113 Paulie.
Do you think Paulie was robbed through the actions of a planted judge as he implied himself in post-fight interview - or was the anomalous scoring by Schreck just the actions of a poorly trained / under-qualified / inattentive boxing judge?
Do you think Paulie was robbed through the actions of a planted judge as he implied himself in post-fight interview - or was the anomalous scoring by Schreck just the actions of a poorly trained / under-qualified / inattentive boxing judge?
Comment