Has froch earned a place in the p4p top 10?

[Batman8]

as long as he's behind broner, im ok with it

[fvanesbeck]

as long as he's behind broner, im ok with it

I'm assuming this is a joke.

If not, then you're an idiot. Broner hasn't fought anyone in the top 100 p4p. Froch has fought quite a few and beaten everyone but Ward.

[teddycanyon]

as long as he's behind broner, im ok with it

what? no. Broner's best wins were Jason Litzau and Antonio DeMarco, how do you compare that to what Froch has accomplished, beating his entire division with the sole exception of the p4p #2 fighter in the world?

[The Hammer]

What do you think, I think he should be in there, he's proven it these last 5 years

Of course he should be in the top ten P4P.

To have Adrien Broner there but not Froch is ridiculous.

[IronDanHamza]

I think that's unquestionable at this point.

[-Huey-]

if ring magazine had any credibility they'd take out broner, canelo and bradley out of the top ten and add in froch, rigondeaux and donaire...

Donaire? Hell no...Abner Mares!

[Public_Enemy]

I think he should've been on there beforehand but now it should be a resounding Yes.

[DeepSleep]

Can't see how he couldn't be. He has proven himself to be legit repeatedly.

[_original_]

As everybody has already said, he should have already been there.


Him beating Kessler was a good win, but not great IMO. I felt that Froch had won the first one and Kessler is pretty past it at this point. It was good for him to get payback though.

[crold1]

What do you think, I think he should be in there, he's proven it these last 5 years

He was there in mine before the Ward fight and back after Bute. If fighting the best schedule in boxing and winning 8 of 10 in the stretch isn't P4P than the mythical ratings are even more worthless than they seem. He ain't the top dog or anything, but guys like he and Mares are doing it IN THE RING. He rates ahead of Martinez after tonight at least. Wins over Bute and Kessler trump his last few.