Which of these euros should join the IBHOF?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LELBRON
    Banned
    • May 2013
    • 35
    • 6
    • 0
    • 60

    #21
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    Lol are you serious? Neither three didn't do anything even remotely close to Froch and Kessler.
    jesus
    tittyfucking
    christ!

    That sir, is an embarrassingly ignorant statement.

    Comment

    • LacedUp
      Still Smokin'
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 29171
      • 781
      • 381
      • 132,163

      #22
      Originally posted by D-MiZe


      Do you even know who the people are that the guy mentioned?
      Are you serious right now? Collins came up short and beat an old Chris Eubank for the only world title he won and a way past it, coming off a loss Benn? How does that compare to a 3 time world champion? or a 5 time world champion? Kalambay lost a bunch of times, and lost against mediocre opposition.

      Don't try to son me you idiot.

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #23
        Originally posted by LELBRON
        jesus
        tittyfucking
        christ!

        That sir, is an embarrassingly ignorant statement.
        More embarrassing than calling Froch and Kessler "clowns"? Haha.

        What did the three of them do that made them better than Froch and Kessler?

        Comment

        • D-MiZe
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 25073
          • 1,061
          • 371
          • 75,542

          #24
          Originally posted by LacedUp
          Are you serious right now? Collins came up short and beat an old Chris Eubank for the only world title he won and a way past it, coming off a loss Benn? How does that compare to a 3 time world champion? or a 5 time world champion? Kalambay lost a bunch of times, and lost against mediocre opposition.

          Don't try to son me you idiot.
          I'm howling, please continue...




          What puts Froch higher than Kalambay?

          Comment

          • bravestone
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 1124
            • 25
            • 6
            • 1,353

            #25
            Wladmir.

            I don't see how Kessler, Sturm or Abraham get in. Froch maybe if he beats Kessler.

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #26
              Originally posted by D-MiZe
              I'm howling, please continue...




              What puts Froch higher than Kalambay?
              Let's look at his best wins shall we?

              Collins, Graham and Barkley would you agree? Let's look at Froch's best wins, Pascal, Taylor and Bute would you agree? Barkley was a journeyman who'd already lost a few times and Collins was coming off a loss. I do give him credit for the Collins win, just because of what collins achieved later in his career. But Collins wasn't as gifted as Kessler is by any stretch of the imagination. Kalambay came up short so many times throughout his career, whereas Froch and Kessler only came up short when fighting the very best.

              In fact, just looking down his resume, some of the losses he took were shocking. Kalule, a light middleweight, Duane Thomas, Buzzetti. I mean seriously? He then took acceptable losses I guess against Pyatt, McCallum and Nunn. one of which he was KOd in the first round.
              Last edited by LacedUp; 05-17-2013, 09:16 AM.

              Comment

              • D-MiZe
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 25073
                • 1,061
                • 371
                • 75,542

                #27
                Originally posted by LacedUp
                Let's look at his best wins shall we?

                Collins, Graham and Barkley would you agree? Let's look at Froch's best wins, Pascal, Taylor and Bute would you agree? Barkley was a journeyman who'd already lost a few times and Collins was coming off a loss. I do give him credit for the Collins win, just because of what collins achieved later in his career. But Collins wasn't as gifted as Kessler is by any stretch of the imagination. Kalambay came up short so many times throughout his career, whereas Froch and Kessler only came up short when fighting the very best.
                You're trolling.

                Nice effort though, nearly had me going for a second. I actually started to believe you were really that ignorant.

                Comment

                • LacedUp
                  Still Smokin'
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 29171
                  • 781
                  • 381
                  • 132,163

                  #28
                  Originally posted by D-MiZe
                  You're trolling.

                  Nice effort though, nearly had me going for a second. I actually started to believe you were really that ignorant.
                  Typical response.

                  Let me ask you, what made Kalambay better than Froch? Or at least higher in the ATG listings.

                  Comment

                  • D-MiZe
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 25073
                    • 1,061
                    • 371
                    • 75,542

                    #29
                    Originally posted by LacedUp
                    Typical response.

                    Let me ask you, what made Kalambay better than Froch? Or at least higher in the ATG listings.
                    Do you know why it's a typical response?

                    Because trying to debate with you leads nowhere and your reasoning for Froch > Kalamby proves how ignorant and unaware you are. You list one of Froch's best wins as the Taylor fight, a fight in which he was losing.

                    All of Froch's best wins added together do not match Kalamby's single greatest win, Mike McCallum.

                    Comment

                    • bravestone
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 1124
                      • 25
                      • 6
                      • 1,353

                      #30
                      Originally posted by LacedUp
                      Let's look at his best wins shall we?

                      Collins, Graham and Barkley would you agree? Let's look at Froch's best wins, Pascal, Taylor and Bute would you agree? Barkley was a journeyman who'd already lost a few times and Collins was coming off a loss. I do give him credit for the Collins win, just because of what collins achieved later in his career. But Collins wasn't as gifted as Kessler is by any stretch of the imagination. Kalambay came up short so many times throughout his career, whereas Froch and Kessler only came up short when fighting the very best.

                      In fact, just looking down his resume, some of the losses he took were shocking. Kalule, a light middleweight, Duane Thomas, Buzzetti. I mean seriously? He then took acceptable losses I guess against Pyatt, McCallum and Nunn. one of which he was KOd in the first round.
                      You not even mentioning Kalambay beating McCallum shows you aren't actually serious.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP