VADA vs USADA

[Kenny MF Powers]

Floyd uses USADA so it is criticised. In all seriousness I think that it is ludicrous for people to believe they would sacrifice their reputation over the likes of Morales and Mayweather.

This post hit the nail on the head.

How about instead of turning everything into an Alex Jones style conspiracy we applaud fighters willing to submit to a better form of testing?

All most of you mother ****ers ever do is attempt to discredit something... God damn. Get the **** over it.

[Fetta]

They both good for me as one tests athletes for world competitions and the other just started but is primarly boxing but so far seems good.

[Light_Speed]

People are hard on USADA but it's up to the promoter's ultimately if they want to continue on with the card or not. Do people actually expect an event to be scrapped like 2 days before if a fighter fails a test?

And why aren't the commissions trying to enhance their testing? They literally aren't doing anything despite all this controversy. It's shocking.

No it should be up to the commission whether or not a fighter on PED is allowed to fight, but they need to be informed right away when there's a positive test, not several days later.

Because it costs a lot of money.

He's correct though. How many articles have you seen written about the mistakes conducted by VADA?

Can you mention some of their mistakes?

[junior gong]

USADA's record in boxing is not good, the Morales incident is a real black mark against them.

And the Quillin incident.

USADA is shady as ****. Golden Boy's refusal to use VADA instead and the terrible track record so far doesn't make the connection between the two look very good.

Im not sure why anyone would choose USADA. They are 5X more expensive, have black marks against them. Morales tested positive, so they tested like 73 samples from him and they still let him fight and then 4 months after said he cheated

Because they're knowingly engaging in a farce.

That is not all they do, they also declare if he cheated of not. He tested positive and it was pretty clear he cheated (morales) since he tested positive in 2 different samples a week apart. So instead of branding him a cheater and telling the commission to not allow the fight to go on, they "informed them that there might be a violation". Then 5 months later they concluded he cheated

This. How do you analyze Quillin/Wright and Morales and say you prefer USADA over VADA? **** makes no sense. A bit too shady, I say.

This ^^^^^^