Can someone explain the difference between these two?
VADA vs USADA
Collapse
-
One has been established for years, the other was started by an opportunist (Margaret Goodman) who seen the void in boxing for drug testing and seen the money to be made and took advantage. -
Floyd runs USADA through a covert, highly classified top secret shadow organization. They also take candy from babies.
VADA is run by the Pope himself and is super duper neat-o. They also help old ladies across the street.
Source: P. StansComment
-
-
USADA has done some shady **** (re-tested fighters until they tested negative, destroyed samples) while VADA keeps everything on the up and up. In case of a positive test, VADA informs the fighter and the commission, USADA informs the promoter but not the commission. More info here.Comment
-
lol, that's Hauser's calling card, mention all the other promoters repeatedly when discussing PEDS. Bring up JCC Jr. and Hauser can't recall who his promoter is. Oh well, let's just not mention it in the article. bwahaha.
Comment
-
Comment
-
USADA seems like the go to place for drug cheats.
There's a recent article on FloydHype about how Paulie requested VADA testing with Broner, considering the jump in weight Broner is taking to make the fight. Apparently Broner and his handlers told him "if you want VADA, fight is off." They were literally getting ready to cancel a fight because the agency of THEIR choice wasn't going to be used.
Almost sounds like they have something to hide. And hidden it will remain, just like they're known to do.
Link http://www.fighthype.com/news/article14405.htmlComment
-
USADA has done some shady **** (re-tested fighters until they tested negative, destroyed samples) while VADA keeps everything on the up and up. In case of a positive test, VADA informs the fighter and the commission, USADA informs the promoter but not the commission. More info here.Comment
-
USADA tried to hide Morales positive result. Refused to reveal Floyd full test report regarding about the failed 3 tests on 3 occasions.Comment
Comment