Comments Thread For: Mayweather: If I Beat Canelo, They Will Create More Foes

[HeroBando]

prove it...

What? I'm not saying he flunked the tests, I'm responding to the other guy who said there'd be a storm if Floyd was accused of this. Well he was accused by someone a whole lot more credible than Floyd Sr, and all we heard was crickets

[J The UnBiased]

Compare their top 3 wins, please.

Nm, Canelo's best win came after Guerrero was signed, but at this point Canelo has better wins that Guerrero

Guerrero gets credit for beating Aiken, Klassen, Katsidis, Aydin and Berto.
Canelo beat a 57 year old Shane Mosley and in my opinion drew with Austin Trout.

[J The UnBiased]

What? I'm not saying he flunked the tests, I'm responding to the other guy who said there'd be a storm if Floyd was accused of this. Well he was accused by someone a whole lot more credible than Floyd Sr, and all we heard was crickets

Well that's because neither Floyd Sr. nor the man you're referring to had proof. It was totally ridiculous of Sr. and Roger to go on that whole "A-Side Meth" tirade on Pacquiao, and it's even more ****** of that writer to make up a story about receiving negative drug test results from Floyd.

[J The UnBiased]

All Floyd said was:
"Fight you Hatton where you are KING? Hell NO! I want you where I saw you struggle and where you only fought once. You will have a harder time doing what you do best at 147 than against the smaller 140 fighters. Oh yeah, just to be sure, that I have all the advantages, I'm going to make sure Joe Cortez is ref!"

Mayweather picks the refs now? Oh my god you people are dumb.

[AHUEVO]

I believe if he fought any of those guys in their prime... he probably would have a couple of losses.

I think most would agree with this statement.

[White_Knight]

Anyone who thinks Floyd will accept a fight with Alvarez is ******ed.

[HeroBando]

Guerrero gets credit for beating Aiken, Klassen, Katsidis, Aydin and Berto.
Canelo beat a 57 year old Shane Mosley and in my opinion drew with Austin Trout.

Come one, Aiken, Klassen, Katsidis, Aydin? Those guys are at the level of Gomez, Rhodes or washed up Cintron, every one of them. So it's basically Berto, unranked coming off a PED suspension, vs Trout who depending on your POV had it easier vs Cotto than Floyd

[octagon]

This guy is something else. He gets mad because people don't want to buy his bullchet. Like who wants to see his fights anyway as cherry picks that they are. If he refuses to fight the best he should just do the sport a favor and retire. Sell his retirement speech on PPV and ill buy that to help him stay retired

[Frank Ducketts]

Righttt

Cotto offered the catchweight, fact, cotto also said he was in his best ever condition after his best ever camp. fact. there goes your first part, you need to do your research, I believe cotto himself rather than you guessing.

Hatton, are you serious? hatton was nothing at 147, he showed that before he fought floyd when he almost got knocked out bar the help from a ref. pac fought hatton at his best weight, hatton himself said he was much better at 140 rather than 147 (another fact btw that hatton said that)

see where this is going kid? you are guessing while I am telling you what fighters said themselves and have done

for the love of god, stop using the 3rd ranked welter bs with guerrero, the whole world knows rankings are bs, a great example is wbc having khan as the 2nd at 147, will you start spouting khan being the 2nd best atfer that? guerrero was not even in the top 5 of ww, he just moved up 2 fights ago for christ sake from lightweight. stop using that bs, you are making yourself look ******

oscar, now now, go on google and look at what oscar has said before and after the fight, why do you post your rubbish? when floyd got to oscar, he was a part time fighter coming off 1 rubbish fight vs mayorga and a long lay off, he was winning after 6 rounds and then his age showed, oscar in his prime would have won that fight

mosley, 18 month lay off and nearly 40, do I need to say more? use your brain kid

Now now, lets go back in time....

who was the best at 135 when floyd was there....a prime mosley...hmm what happened? quack quack?

who was the best at 140, kostya? what did floyd do? quack quack?

who was the best at 147? cotto/margo/williams, HE BLOODY RETIRED! HAHAHA yes, can you believe that? instead of fighting the top 147s, he picked a 140 fighter and then retired, coming back when they were finished!

then pacman...dear lord, 14 days, 7 days, 3 days and 0 days, all agreed and then he changed the split to duck him, christ sake

the evident is there, floyd has ducked the best, he picked on cherry picked fights most of his career, especially in his prime

history will always remember floyd ducking the best at 147, remember that

yes yess, floyd beats all of the guys he ducked, that what fools like you post time and time again, if thats the case, why did he duck them ALL?

You are truly one of the sorriest, fakest, lying ass posters here, lmao. Go join East Side Boxing. They take all the degenerate Homers and let them say what they want there.

[turnedup]

If you aren't a paying Mayweather fan then why are you in here whinin on paying fan's behalf? Obviously the people who constantly pay to see Mayweather fight don't have a problem with his opponents. Keep your money(and your whining) hater, you aren't hurting Mayweather by not paying for his fights.

I love how you always reply without even reading the entire post. Nowhere did I bash him but i'm hating and whining?..infact i've been to two of his fights live, which I am pretty much certain cost me more than all the PPV's you've bought of his combined, that's not counting the PPV's I have also bought. Just because I haven't spent money lately on him does not make me less of a paying fan or fan of the sport. You feel only those who are happy with him should have an opinion which I find absolutely ludicrous. Now please point out where i've hated or whined. I'd love to see it. I'm not hurting him by not paying for his events? When did I say I wanted to hurt him? Seriously man, get your chip off your shoulder..I know you've got a hard on for me anytime I post. Frankly it's disgusting and truly makes you look trollish. If you are happy with his opponents good for you, I personally don't see the value besides the hyping of selling the fight. A month before Guerrero was announced everyone was trashing the fight, next month he was an excellent opponent. I like when a fight is announced it doesn't need any hype, the hype already comes built in because of the undeniable caliber of both men who are going to fight. If you don't have at least 60 rounds or so at welterweight you should not be getting a shot against the top dog..sorry but you shouldn't. You haven't earned that yet, most of his recent opponents have on average 10-16 rounds of welterweight experience.