look mayweather the best..... this is the time as us fans need to unite and push for a mayweather pacuaio fight.... top welterwiegts are bradley marquez, and canelo. he should come down to fight floyd after the trout performance, no compare to mayweathers better than hagler lenard duran chavez perfomance tonight.. but really who does goldonboy have offer other than khan peterson and others at 140 but have no mainstream name. pacquiao mayweather only fight that makes since cause there is no one on this earth that will give mayweather a competive fight than congress man pacquiao.. i kno it pacs knos it, boxing needs it....dont be fooled canelo need more time.. but i kno this a business first and arum and his china dreams got to go.. boxing needs pacquiao mayweather now more than ever!!!!!!!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Koncz: Pacquiao is The Only One To Test Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Chups View Post?? I thought Pacquiao is the one who needs to take the test?
look mayweather the best..... this is the time as us fans need to unite and push for a mayweather pacuaio fight.... top welterwiegts are bradley marquez, and canelo. he should come down to fight floyd after the trout performance, no compare to mayweathers better than hagler lenard duran chavez perfomance tonight.. but really who does goldonboy have offer other than khan peterson and others at 140 but have no mainstream name. pacquiao mayweather only fight that makes since cause there is no one on this earth that will give mayweather a competive fight than congress man pacquiao.. i kno it pacs knos it, boxing needs it....dont be fooled canelo need more time.. but i kno this a business first and arum and his china dreams got to go.. boxing needs pacquiao mayweather now more than ever!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kingzapata02 View Postlook mayweather the best..... this is the time as us fans need to unite and push for a mayweather pacuaio fight.... top welterwiegts are bradley marquez, and canelo. he should come down to fight floyd after the trout performance, no compare to mayweathers better than hagler lenard duran chavez perfomance tonight.. but really who does goldonboy have offer other than khan peterson and others at 140 but have no mainstream name. pacquiao mayweather only fight that makes since cause there is no one on this earth that will give mayweather a competive fight than congress man pacquiao.. i kno it pacs knos it, boxing needs it....dont be fooled canelo need more time.. but i kno this a business first and arum and his china dreams got to go.. boxing needs pacquiao mayweather now more than ever!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
We all know Koncz is right. Nobody except Canelo and Pacquiao right now has the name, the adulation, and the fight skills to be in the same ring as Mayweather.
Putting in names like Alexander, Ortiz, Khan, and some Guerrero 2 just sounds like Floyd is making true with his statement he's back to challenge the weakest champions/challengers out there.
Legacy of ducking yes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostYou're lving in la la land. The 3 fights prior was pretty damn close and debatable. Manny also said he wanted to prove once and for all that he was the better fighter and the 4th fight was the last. Manny knocked Marquez down 5 times in 4 fights and couldn't finish him. Marquez done him off with one punch in the 4th fight. Manny even said he underestimated JMM in the 3rd fight and threatened Pinoys to say he won or else they weren't real Pinoys. All of this is documented. Reality welcomes you to come join us.
* You write, "Manny also said he wanted to prove once and for all that he was the better fighter and the 4th fight was the last".
Its great that you can take a quote out of context, but does that change the fact that it took 4 tries to pass the pacquiao test? Serious question. You are trying to illustrate that Pacquiao holds the 4th fight as a final verdict. I am saying that 1 out of 4 does not make you better. If you want to hold that quote as a final verdict on how to measure, feel free to be selective on quotes to hold as measuring sstandards, but regardless of your quote, let us not suspend logic and math and say 1 victory out of 4 is major accomplishment. Make sense?
* "Manny knocked Marquez down 5 times in 4 fights and couldn't finish him. Marquez done him off with one punch in the 4th fight. "
Yeah he "done him off with one punch in the 4th fight. On one hand you are magnifying the greatness of Marquez to do it in one punch but at the same time the fact about the "4th fight" is still in there which has been point all along. So you still don't accomplish anything with your reply. I mean who the hell gets 4 tries to figure another fighter out. Finally he did it. I'm happy for him as well. lol
* "Manny even said he underestimated JMM in the 3rd fight and threatened Pinoys to say he won or else they weren't real Pinoys. All of this is documented. "
Again more noise, that does nothing to actually make anything I said wrong. It is only in the mind of a pacquiao hater that there is this widespread memo that every pinoy got a hold of to squash there opinions of a marquez victory in order to keep their iden******. The possibility of them seeing a close fight in the 3rd fight (where pacquiao got a split W is not existant) it is only based on this widespread threat that everyone heard and paid attention to. Do you really hear what you are saying?
My points still hold.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pwned View PostSo how does make anything I said wrong? You can look at everything you said and it does not address nullify anything I mentioned.
* You write, "Manny also said he wanted to prove once and for all that he was the better fighter and the 4th fight was the last".
Its great that you can take a quote out of context, but does that change the fact that it took 4 tries to pass the pacquiao test? Serious question. You are trying to illustrate that Pacquiao holds the 4th fight as a final verdict. I am saying that 1 out of 4 does not make you better. If you want to hold that quote as a final verdict on how to measure, feel free to be selective on quotes to hold as measuring sstandards, but regardless of your quote, let us not suspend logic and math and say 1 victory out of 4 is major accomplishment. Make sense?
* "Manny knocked Marquez down 5 times in 4 fights and couldn't finish him. Marquez done him off with one punch in the 4th fight. "
Yeah he "done him off with one punch in the 4th fight. On one hand you are magnifying the greatness of Marquez to do it in one punch but at the same time the fact about the "4th fight" is still in there which has been point all along. So you still don't accomplish anything with your reply. I mean who the hell gets 4 tries to figure another fighter out. Finally he did it. I'm happy for him as well. lol
* "Manny even said he underestimated JMM in the 3rd fight and threatened Pinoys to say he won or else they weren't real Pinoys. All of this is documented. "
Again more noise, that does nothing to actually make anything I said wrong. It is only in the mind of a pacquiao hater that there is this widespread memo that every pinoy got a hold of to squash there opinions of a marquez victory in order to keep their iden******. The possibility of them seeing a close fight in the 3rd fight (where pacquiao got a split W is not existant) it is only based on this widespread threat that everyone heard and paid attention to. Do you really hear what you are saying?
My points still hold.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostSee, this is where you have to not be taken seriously. Mayweather has always been one of thee fastest boxers in the sport. He has been praised for his speed. Floyd is better than JMM technically and he is for sure a better counter puncher. Trying to say Floyd is not as good as JMM technically to make Manny look like Floyd is less of a challenge than JMM is desperate thinking homie. Especially since Floyd toyed and shook the rust off when he fought JMM. Even the Marquez that KO'd Pacquiao said he doesn't want none of Floyd in a rematch. Your argument is mute.
Comment
Comment