Is Wlad the greatest of all times?

[SERGEY DRAGO]

.DRAGO is greatest of all times!!!

[titanium]

No he is the best of this era but there have been many era's and many dominant champions. This era is the one of the weakest eras in history.
Maybe he can break the top ten in time.

[Elroy1]

No he is the best of this era but there have been many era's and many dominant champions. This era is the one of the weakest eras in history.
Maybe he can break the top ten in time.

Well aside from weakest in history rubbish which I wont entertain again,

there has actually never been a champion as dominant as Klitschko ever in history.

Ok, so you can point to Marciano, sure. But then again that probably WAS among the weakest eras in history

[Long jabber]

Well aside from weakest in history rubbish which I wont entertain again,

there has actually never been a champion as dominant as Klitschko ever in history.

Ok, so you can point to Marciano, sure. But then again that probably WAS among the weakest eras in history

prime tyson was more dominant didnt take him so many years to clean the division.

he took them out in more devastating fashion

like merchant said about mike being predictable

so is a hurricane but you still cant do anything about it

[Roja's480]

Wlad who?

[M Bison]

What makes him better than Joe Louis? That's a very serious statement.

Joe Louis primarily fought cruiserweights at the top
Wladimir Klitschko has fought heavyweights from start to current of his professional career

/end thread

[M Bison]

Well aside from weakest in history rubbish which I wont entertain again,

there has actually never been a champion as dominant as Klitschko ever in history.

Ok, so you can point to Marciano, sure. But then again that probably WAS among the weakest eras in history

Apparently Marcianos and Joe Louis eras were rife with talent that would just storm this heavyweight division right now and clean it out

The division in the 60's all the way to the 90's are one of the most overrated, hyped stories to this very day.
If their was no Yank in the limelight you can bet your sweet ass that they'd have been saying the same thing they're saying right now
"Oh it weak, I base this off of absolutely nothing."

[Elroy1]

prime tyson was more dominant didnt take him so many years to clean the division.

he took them out in more devastating fashion

like merchant said about mike being predictable

so is a hurricane but you still cant do anything about it

Hmm, yeah I know what your saying, if you focus on his first career alone maybe. And he definitely took out in more devastating fashion too.

Wlad's career has been one of extended and complete dominance though throughout. There is no boxer with that many HW fights with as few losses either.

So guess it's what you call dominant. But good call on that one!!

If we gauge it on notoriety as well then Mike is the man, nobody anywhere will ever forget Tyson.

Nice Merchant quote too!!

[cupocity303]

No, not on paper, but he is up there on skill or better yet ABILITY to dominate opponents like only a few can.

And if you take away the affirmative action for smaller fighters (I.E. lower weight divisions), he would be the King of em' all. Not only can he beat the biggest guys in his weight and height, but he'd steamroll over the manlets like Mayweather and Pacquiao.

Sidenote: I'd be rooting for Hopkins if he were to face him but there is just no way.

[Elroy1]

Apparently Marcianos and Joe Louis eras were rife with talent that would just storm this heavyweight division right now and clean it out

The division in the 60's all the way to the 90's are one of the most overrated, hyped stories to this very day.
If their was no Yank in the limelight you can bet your sweet ass that they'd have been saying the same thing they're saying right now
"Oh it weak, I base this off of absolutely nothing."

Seems to be a long running joke around here.

I would confidently bet a few hung on the modern guy doing "random select" of opponents haha