why do people think pac is an atg

[RedLights]

2 loses in a row... sorry it tarnishes his legacy... plus he should have more loses against marquez...

[LeG00N]

reported because you're an alt, this thread has no substance and you're in red and trolling.

[Revention]

because top rank told us to

[thuggery]

Alt's galore

[RedLights]

sry that was my buddy that made this thread....

[Kagami Taiga]

because he is???

[Reloaded]

2 loses in a row... sorry it tarnishes his legacy... plus he should have more loses against marquez...

That doesnt take away what you were at your best , Ali was a bum if you look at his Holmes fight , look at Roy Jones , nah kid ATG is a your best status that you reach at your peak and after that is just getting old .

[Mr. Fantastic]

2 loses in a row... sorry it tarnishes his legacy... plus he should have more loses against marquez...

I wonder what you think of Roy Jones.

[DuckDodgers]

Can you please define ATG? Are you talking top 10, 20, 30? I don't think you can deny that Pacquiao is at least a top 50 p4p fighter of all-time, and probably much, much higher than that. Regardless of the catch-weight fight at 154 (which I have no problem with and still shortened Pac's career), Manny won legitimate titles in 8 weight classes. That's insane. He was lineal champ in at least 3 of those classes, and could easily have been lineal in 3 more. He has victories over at least 6 lock hall of famers (Morales, Barrera, Marquez, Cotto, Mosley, De La Hoya) and many more possible inductees (Hatton). He was unreal at FW and JLW, dismantling some incredibly tough guys that were on their way to stardom (Ledwaba). He spent the last few years of his career physically beating up MUCH larger guys and electrified the sport in ways that only a handful of people ever have (Louis, Ali). I don't see any legitimate argument against considering Pac an ATG.

Btw- Pac in 2009-2010 was as unstoppable as any fighter has ever been at their peak.

[littlemac]

TS knows the what his talking about