Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez: "Austin Trout Rematch is Not Needed"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mike gonzalez
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 459
    • 25
    • 0
    • 6,540

    #51
    Canelo vs Trout bout was. eh!!!

    Canelo fight Erislady Lara he is #1 WBC and #1 WBA contender at 154 pounds.

    Comment

    • Jloro
      Invicta
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 6930
      • 258
      • 811
      • 15,033

      #52
      Lol some of you guys on here are like pushing ******ation our something.
      Nobody "has to" give anyone a rematch but I think Canelo scared that he can't pull off another "decision".




      In other words he *****in out



      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

      Comment

      • Cinci Champ
        And Still!!!
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2012
        • 9374
        • 301
        • 139
        • 23,582

        #53
        ya i agree no rematch is needed not every dam fight needs a rematch close or not

        Comment

        • A-Wolf
          This One Can See
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 6759
          • 265
          • 337
          • 61,371

          #54
          For a conclusive win it is. Fine with me though. I'm ready for Canelo's next chapter. Should he eventually lose people will go back on this fight and talk about how he "really lost to Trout," ect, however. His choice.

          Comment

          • 4Corners
            Nothing But Sunshine
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2011
            • 14441
            • 485
            • 83
            • 25,167

            #55
            We all knew if Canelo won there would be no rematch.

            If Canelo-Floyd isn't happening, he should fight the Lara/Angulo winner.

            Comment

            • FrankieClutch
              OTSC
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6084
              • 177
              • 396
              • 26,671

              #56
              I sort of agree

              I don't think an immediate rematch is necessary, but I would not be surprised if they met a little later on in their careers.

              Comment

              • pistol whip
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 8645
                • 255
                • 4
                • 15,040

                #57
                You know who the real pusssies are? All you limp wristed p ussies who blasted Canelo for not having a win over a top contender and now that he has that what do you shiiiitt birds do. You find another excuse!!! Oh now he's scared because he had a competitive fight won and now he wants to move on. Shut the *** up!!! He won and none of you have the balls to admit you were wrong and now you have new excuses. It's like having a conversation with my sisters kid.

                Comment

                • TerrisJ3
                  Underlord
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 449
                  • 18
                  • 7
                  • 6,744

                  #58
                  Originally posted by 4Corners
                  We all knew if Canelo won there would be no rematch.

                  If Canelo-Floyd isn't happening, he should fight the Lara/Angulo winner.
                  Angulo would get outboxed & battered for 12. Lara is a dirty boxer that would get chopped down once he steps up in competition, whether its by controversy or brutality. Wish them both luck tho!
                  Last edited by TerrisJ3; 04-25-2013, 01:54 AM.

                  Comment

                  • paulf
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 23701
                    • 3,324
                    • 2,093
                    • 1,052,140

                    #59
                    Originally posted by pistol whip
                    You know who the real pusssies are? All you limp wristed p ussies who blasted Canelo for not having a win over a top contender and now that he has that what do you shiiiitt birds do. You find another excuse!!! Oh now he's scared because he had a competitive fight won and now he wants to move on. Shut the *** up!!! He won and none of you have the balls to admit you were wrong and now you have new excuses. It's like having a conversation with my sisters kid.
                    Yup. After making post after post trying to discredit the man as a hype job, fools cant emotionally handle the fact that Canelo taxed that ass.

                    Comment

                    • flint
                      Pac smashed my mom
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 5814
                      • 236
                      • 0
                      • 6,130

                      #60
                      i thought trout won a close decision even though canelo did knock him down. but that judge that had trout only winning two rounds put the robbery idial in the mix.texas always shoots itself in its boxing foot. you'd think that they use that big stage to correct things and make a good showing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP