Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez: "Austin Trout Rematch is Not Needed"
Collapse
-
-
Yeah I think 8-4 is a reasonable score I mean maybe you thought that Canelo and Trout were having an Amature boxing match so maybe thats why you scored it diffrent. You didn't notice that they wernt wearing headgear?Comment
-
Originally posted by ColdCa$hCaneloQuote:
Originally Posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
I wonder why...
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
there's no money in it boxing is a business
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
no need
For a rematch because you told trout in order to get the fight he cohldnt get a rematch clause if you won........but also put in a rematch clause for you if you lost! Que puto eres! I thought you won but just as Marquez said, beating trout doesn't make you an elite fighter!
Now that you've beaten your 1st real challenge, I hope you keep fighting top level guys in YOUR division or move up!Comment
-
I read this as, "Oscar says we can't keep paying off judges, we need to go back to fighting smaller and semi-retired guys."
Actually, I don't blame Canelo did anything he says as he's clearly not making any decisions. He's following his management and they're making it work for him. Can't hate on him for that.Comment
-
I didn't see this fight being close at all. Not a fan of either fighter, really, but Canelo won by a landslide.Comment
-
-
8-4 really dude? This was a close fight and I think the right guy won but I really can't stand bias people. 8-4 is def a bias score card. I think Canelo won by 1 or 2 rounds with the knock down being a big factor.Comment
-
I agree with Alvarez. I felt he clearly won the fight. I actually enjoyed the scrap and it had it's moment of drama in the 7th stanza to boot, but I want to see both guys in fresh, new matches next time out.
War Canelo! War Trout!Comment
Comment