I can't see how anyone can make a case for this being a good performance...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyson Fury vs Steve Cunningham: Who will win?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Cuban Linx View PostI can't see how anyone can make a case for this being a good performance...
Oh, for the days of Quartey, Forrest, Vargas, DLH, Tito, Winky, Mosley, Mayorga, etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Earl Hickey View PostIt wasn't.
Still, knocking out a 2 time world champion who's never been stopped before even though you fought like **** has to be a good thing...
You see, a forearm-righthand is not a legitimate boxing combination. The forearm strike is the thing which set up the "knockout".
Now, were this MMA, or backyard brawling, it may be a different story, but this is professional boxing. Or so we were told, at least.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nodogoshi View PostNot when you have to foul your way to victory, including in the so-called "knockout".
You see, a forearm-righthand is not a legitimate boxing combination. The forearm strike is the thing which set up the "knockout".
Now, were this MMA, or backyard brawling, it may be a different story, but this is professional boxing. Or so we were told, at least.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Earl Hickey View PostWell it's a fight, if ***** ass cunningham can't handle the heat, maybe he should get back in the kitchen like a *****.Last edited by Drunken Cat; 04-21-2013, 03:09 AM.
Comment
-
Or perhaps, this professional boxing business really isn't for Fury, after all. He should just stick to Irish travelers' fighting instead.Last edited by Drunken Cat; 04-21-2013, 03:29 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostGosh, I was imagining Wlad devouring Fury within like 3 rounds. I actually think Wlad would have to carry him a few rds to help the fans get their money's worth but all Fury's taking pre-fight would likely lead to a eary early KO.
Comment
Comment