Should Marquez Get 50% of The Pacquiao 5 Purse?

[Meanrighthook29]

He should yes.. arguably won the first 3 and put the icing on the cake in the 4th. He deserves it now. He wont get it though, but should he? Yes.

[Heavy Hitter]

Really? Tell me about Pac's PPV numbers in his fight before Marquez 4. Now, tell me what Marquez was doing around that same time..... Cable TV, no name opponent.

You made a point of using an analogy of saying JMM brings no money to the fight. Thats untrue. Check the PPV numbers that Arum released of JMM III then Bradley, & then JMM IV. JMM clearly brings money to the table in the US, and a lot more from Mexico. Also factor in that JMM star is rising the past few years, and you have to figure that its even higher now that he knocked Pacquiao out.

Regardless of that my main theme in all these JMM vs Pacquiao money share threads has been: JMM has stated that he isn't interested in the Pacquiao V match and hints that it will take 50% for him to look at it. The onus is not on JMM to make this fight, its on the Pacquiao side.

[SplitSecond]

You're a Pac fan....who isn't though i guess....What separates us is that you're also a ******, hence the reason you replied to a post that specifically questioned ******ed Pac fans.

That's cool though. Some people are ******s, and some people are Pac fans, you just happen to be both.

that's a good safeguard on your posts so anyone that calls you out on your bias and fake claims is a "******"
but i suppose you're also ****** floyd fan, who can't help but involve floyd in anything regarding pacquiao

aww u ****** floyd fans

[BennyST]

that's a good safeguard on your posts so someone wont call you on your ******ity and fake claims
but i suppose you're also ****** floyd fan, who can't help but involve floyd in anything regarding pacquiao

Says the guy bringing Floyd into an argument for no reason.

Farkin hell.

[SplitSecond]

Says the guy bringing Floyd into an argument for no reason.

Farkin hell.

ur ******ed floydboy ass already forget who hopped into the thread "ummm you guys were crying about pacquiao deserving 50-50 with floyd, what if floyd ko pacquiao derp derp" etc

[BennyST]

already forget who hopped into the thread "ummm you guys were crying about pacquiao deserving 50-50 with floyd, what if floyd ko pacquiao derp derp" etc

If you're gonna paraphrase me, at least read the ****ing post properly and get it right.

Unlike you though, bringing the **** up out of the blue for no reason, there was actually a related point to it, just like I also used Duran and Leonard, or did you miss that too?

Bored now. **** off.

[Redd Foxx]

You made a point of using an analogy of saying JMM brings no money to the fight. Thats untrue. Check the PPV numbers that Arum released of JMM III then Bradley, & then JMM IV. JMM clearly brings money to the table in the US, and a lot more from Mexico. Also factor in that JMM star is rising the past few years, and you have to figure that its even higher now that he knocked Pacquiao out.

Regardless of that my main theme in all these JMM vs Pacquiao money share threads has been: JMM has stated that he isn't interested in the Pacquiao V match and hints that it will take 50% for him to look at it. The onus is not on JMM to make this fight, its on the Pacquiao side.

Wrong again. Instead of a loaded comparison with a no-name like Bradley (which still did huge numbers) compare to Margarito which is estimated to have done better. Take the moral ground because the truth isn't in your side here.

[Cinci Champ]

depends how you look at it if manny wants to fight him no matter what then yes. id say his win earns him fifty fifty

[Cinci Champ]

Wrong again. Instead of a loaded comparison with a no-name like Bradley (which still did huge numbers) compare to Margarito which is estimated to have done better. Take the moral ground because the truth isn't in your side here.

there i no doubt jmm pac 5 will dwarf the other 4

[SplitSecond]

If you're gonna paraphrase me, at least read the ****ing post properly and get it right.

Unlike you though, bringing the **** up out of the blue for no reason, there was actually a related point to it, just like I also used Duran and Leonard, or did you miss that too?

Bored now. **** off.

kind of like your reply about me being a pac fan(who you guess im not, but also guess i am?) with no relevency to the actual post but i guess u got butthurt

but no, you **** off