You mean a one sided loss to Pac and a win over a 40 year old all but retired Marquez?
I know what you mean though. He's got a good résumé, but the Pac win does not count. It doesn't matter about the scores, because they were utterly inept, corrupt, completely devoid of reality and not even remotely in line with the rest of the world and the 99% who scored it an easy, clear, wide UD for Pac. Consensus robberies do not count on a résumé. Close fights yes, they can, they were close.
But disgraceful ridiculous robberies do not mean **** and should be blacked out by all fans, writers etc that expect or want any integrity for the sport. Don't start adding to it by pretending that Bradley actually has a win over Pac cause he lost the fight badly.
I know what you mean though. He's got a good résumé, but the Pac win does not count. It doesn't matter about the scores, because they were utterly inept, corrupt, completely devoid of reality and not even remotely in line with the rest of the world and the 99% who scored it an easy, clear, wide UD for Pac. Consensus robberies do not count on a résumé. Close fights yes, they can, they were close.
But disgraceful ridiculous robberies do not mean **** and should be blacked out by all fans, writers etc that expect or want any integrity for the sport. Don't start adding to it by pretending that Bradley actually has a win over Pac cause he lost the fight badly.
Comment