Comments Thread For: Bradley Wants Marquez Next—Not Pacquiao Remtach

[Mike_R]

Honestly I can't feel too bad for Manny here. He snubbed Bradley and now it's just tit for tat on that front.

Pacquiao's next fight is going to be an awkward and a potentially dangerous affair if his age/slipping is legit and continues. I'd hate to see him lose a 3rd straight to a 3rd different fighter. But this is the real world, and there are serious questions now. I don't think the type of run we saw from Pac between 2008-2010 is going to happen again. To beat (insert whoever) then beat Bradley and then beat JMM.. It seems like a tall order to me.

[Cinci Champ]

Make it happen bob. Ill def buy that ppv

me as well without a doubt

[mathed]

You mean a one sided loss to Pac and a win over a 40 year old all but retired Marquez?

I know what you mean though. He's got a good résumé, but the Pac win does not count. It doesn't matter about the scores, because they were utterly inept, corrupt, completely devoid of reality and not even remotely in line with the rest of the world and the 99% who scored it an easy, clear, wide UD for Pac. Consensus robberies do not count on a résumé. Close fights yes, they can, they were close.

But disgraceful ridiculous robberies do not mean **** and should be blacked out by all fans, writers etc that expect or want any integrity for the sport. Don't start adding to it by pretending that Bradley actually has a win over Pac cause he lost the fight badly.

He would have wins over Alexander, Peterson, Abregu, Holt, Witter, Pac and JMM. Regardless of whether you or anyone else thinks he deserved the win, his resume says it's a win and that collection of wins is impressive. A couple of those guys on there only have one single loss...to Bradley.

Pac had his chance for the rematch, he chose JMM, that was his choice and his team's choice. There was plenty of opportunity to get "justice" for himself and all his fans around the world; that's just water under the bridge at this point.

On a personal level to not consider a win is one thing but to just look at the resume and see the names on it as it reads on paper is what I'm talking about. I see where you are coming from though.

[Ringlife]

I hope if they do put this fight on HBO PPV they have a solid undercard.

[letsgobrady]

i would rather see marquez-bradley than to see marquez-pacquiao but i would like to see a bradley-pacquiao rematch at some point

[puga]

do your thing ...

marquez reminds me of this kid that would play tag but would quit as soon as he's "IT"....

[Bushbaby]

Dat good ole juju came back and bit Pacman in the a$$. Didn't wanna give Bradley a rematch. Wanted to fight Cotto at 147 in the 2 peat and made Marquez chase him across too many weight classes. Now look, they're all tellin him to **** off.

[r__mutt]

What's ironic is that the winner would probably go on to fight Pacman, the fighter they both beat (or "beat," in Bradley's case).

Can't see Bradley NOT getting rocked by the new Marquez, assuming the new Marquez is here to stay. Still an ok fight though.

[PAC-BOY]

Dat good ole juju came back and bit Pacman in the a$$. Didn't wanna give Bradley a rematch. Wanted to fight Cotto at 147 in the 2 peat and made Marquez chase him across too many weight classes. Now look, they're all tellin him to **** off.

It called taking the easiest fight for the money. Manny is the biggest paycheck for both of them. Manny dont need either of them.lol
If JMM loses to Manny its over for him. If Bradley loses again to him...its over for him.
No wonder they want to fight each other.

[Bushbaby]

It called taking the easiest fight for the money. Manny is the biggest paycheck for both of them. Manny dont need either of them.lol
If JMM loses to Manny its over for him. If Bradley loses again to him...its over for him.
No wonder they want to fight each other.

Actually unless Pacman retires he needs them far more than they need him. Bradley made his waves in the Provednicov fight and Marquez is the man that effectively owns the series defining win, so.........