Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Trout Confirms USADA Testing, Canelo's Rematch Demand

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by KING MEAT View Post
    more fuel for trout.

    gawdam looks like im rooting for SOG!!!!!!!
    SOG is Ward. Trout is "No Doubt"

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by ThePhantom5 View Post
      Dan Rafael ‏@danrafaelespn 8m
      There is a rematch clause for @caneloOficial in the fight with @NoDoubtTrout, although they're not saying the particulars. #boxing

      Austin Trout ‏@NoDoubtTrout 4m
      @danrafaelespn @canelooficial yeah it's only one sided :/

      Dan Rafael ‏@danrafaelespn 3m
      @NoDoubtTrout So he gets a rematch if you win, but you dont get one if he wins?

      Austin Trout ‏@NoDoubtTrout 3m
      @danrafaelespn exactly!!
      And was that posted before or AFTER our story that detailed all of that at 9am EST.

      http://www.boxingscene.com/trout-con...-demand--64248

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Fetta View Post
        SOG is Ward. Trout is "No Doubt"
        Soldier Of God

        Comment


        • #74
          I'm sure this is normal with big name fighters.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Phenom View Post
            that's because Canelo has a belt while Trout does not Canelo will still fight for WBA Champ if he wins
            I thought this was a unification for Trouts WBA strap with Canelo putting his WBC on the line? As I understand it, Trout does have a strap, but he's defiantly the "B Side" in terms of drawing power.

            I hope its a great fight and both guys can be winners for their performance in the ring, because then boxing wins. It should be a corker of a fight hopefully

            Comment


            • #76
              Canelo is going to put on a show, Schaefer and Golden Girl didn't want the fight, they wanted him to face Bundrage or Angulo or someone instead but the young kid put his foot down. They made the contract stipulations, not Canelo.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by brick wall View Post
                wow usada's rep got badly trashed with that comment.

                the thing with usada is that they're in this just for business. they charge so much and they also accomodate under the table type requests from promoters (mostly gbp).

                vada is cheaper but gbp still prefers usada because they can't control vada. 2 gbp fights got cancelled because of vada testing. when usada caught morales the fight still pushed through. despite the obvious conspiracy, usada still has the audacity to ban morales after the fight...sneaky mother****ers.
                That's why we don't have a way of knowing the accuracy of the results. GBP makes sure the fight happens regardless of the results.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Rick Reeno View Post
                  And was that posted before or AFTER our story that detailed all of that at 9am EST.

                  http://www.boxingscene.com/trout-con...-demand--64248
                  Probably after, you know Fat Dan gets all his dirt from you guys anyways.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by chav View Post
                    I thought this was a unification for Trouts WBA strap with Canelo putting his WBC on the line? As I understand it, Trout does have a strap, but he's defiantly the "B Side" in terms of drawing power.

                    I hope its a great fight and both guys can be winners for their performance in the ring, because then boxing wins. It should be a corker of a fight hopefully
                    I thought the WBC didn't allow for unifications tho?

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      I'm not even mad about canelo's rematch clause. In fact I'd love to see Trout moonwalk all over dat a$$ in a 2 peat.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP