Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Trout Confirms USADA Testing, Canelo's Rematch Demand

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Very Good we need this test ........warrr Strout

    Comment


    • #92
      Wait a minute,Canelo ask for a rematch clause just in case he loses but would not give a rematch clause to Trout.So that means if Canelo gets a gift decision, he can just move on with his career and go on to big fights but Trout has no rematch option and left to start from square 1 again.

      Despite that being a f `ed contract all you guys want to talk about is USADA.This f`ed up contract is a more important topic then USADA`s past.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by boxingfeind View Post
        So that means if Canelo gets a gift decision, he can just move on with his career and go on to big fights but Trout has no rematch option and left to start from square 1 again.
        Making excuses for Trout already are we?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
          I put the link for the Quillin-Wright situation earlier, and Lance Armstrong has reportedly bragged about paying off USADA to another cyclist who tested positive and had his Tour de France title stripped. Landis, I think it was, testified to Armstrong telling him such things.

          The shady behavior of USADA is there to see.
          Lance Armstrong has reportedly also tried bribing USADA for years. And also reportedly has made death threats towards the President of USADA. If Armstrong indeed paid off USADA in the past -- he would have let the entire world know about it to brought them to their knees. There is no way in hell Armstrong would have had such leverage over USADA and NOT have used it against them.

          The fact remains -- USADA is the organization that destroyed Armstrong's reputation at the end of the day, after years and years of denying.

          Comment


          • #95
            might as well not test at all if youre going to use USADA,..watch them throw away the results..

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by puga View Post
              might as well not test at all if youre going to use USADA,..watch them throw away the results..
              GBP is just wasting their money. They should just be honest about it. That they're really oppose to testing. Canceling fights because one boxer or the other is tested positive is like throwing millions of dollars in the garbage.

              Comment


              • #97
                Many people bemoaning the "rematch clause" Alvarez has. This is almost standard procedure for the big stars.
                Klitschko's have used them in their fights, Mayweather has them for basically all of his fights, Pacquiao had one for Bradley among other opponents.

                Such is boxing when you are not a big star and are fighting one. In many cases though the rematch clause gives the lesser known opponent more money in the rematch. If Trout wins its a win-win for him, he's not going to get a Mayweather fight, another fight with Canelo is the most financially awarding fight he can get.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
                  Lance Armstrong has reportedly also tried bribing USADA for years. And also reportedly has made death threats towards the President of USADA. If Armstrong indeed paid off USADA in the past -- he would have let the entire world know about it to brought them to their knees. There is no way in hell Armstrong would have had such leverage over USADA and NOT have used it against them.

                  The fact remains -- USADA is the organization that destroyed Armstrong's reputation at the end of the day, after years and years of denying.
                  bullcrap...it was his former teammates and associates that testified against him that did it for armstrong. usada's testing didn't do **** to expose his cheating. if those people remained silent about it, usada would've not discovered anything.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by brick wall View Post
                    bullcrap...it was his former teammates and associates that testified against him that did it for armstrong. usada's testing didn't do **** to expose his cheating. if those people remained silent about it, usada would've not discovered anything.
                    Of course, USADA's testing didn't do a goddamn thing. That is painfully obvious. LOL. Cheaters were big steps and steps ahead of them back then.

                    Comment


                    • Simply put, USADA is not there to catch cheaters. It's there to conspire with GBP.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP