Why do people think Austin Trout is good?

[SCtrojansbaby]

Why is Mayweather good? Why is Hopkins good?

Oh god. They are both FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR superior offensive fighters.

Trout has absolutely nothing in common with Mayweather or Hopkins.

Trout is more comparable to Devon Alexander except Alexander has much more power

[PACnPBFsuck]

Canelo already has better wins on his resume. Don't get off topic

Better wins at 154? Which ones are they?

[Bushbaby]

He's a low output, feather fisted boxer with absolutely zero offensive ability. Are people really impressed by the fact that he was able to get boring uneventful decisions over 2 blown up over 30 welterweights?

Oh and FYI I am a fan of Canelo's so please this has nothing to do with me trying to hate on him.

Wow, that's quite ironic, to say the least.

[SCtrojansbaby]

I also think its hilarious that no one ever talks about the vacant WBA championship that Trout beat Rigberto Alvarez for(lol) and subsequently defended against 40-12 David Alonso Lopez and 15-4 Frank LoPorto. Yet all I ever hear about Canelo is "Arg the ginger is a paper champ and needs to defends his championship against the best of the best derrrrrrrpitity derp"

[Shogunofharlem1]

He's a low output, feather fisted boxer with absolutely zero offensive ability. Are people really impressed by the fact that he was able to get boring uneventful decisions over 2 blown up over 30 welterweights?

Oh and FYI I am a fan of Canelo's so please this has nothing to do with me trying to hate on him.

Hes a solid 154 pound fighter which is something canelo doesnt have on his resume unless you count Josésito López.

[Bushbaby]

Hes a solid 154 pound fighter which is something canelo doesnt have on his resume unless you count Josésito López.

He probably does though.

[SCtrojansbaby]

Hes a solid 154 pound fighter which is something canelo doesnt have on his resume unless you count Josésito López.

Ryan Rhodes was a more proven fighter at 154 than Trout is

[Shogunofharlem1]

Ryan Rhodes was a more proven fighter at 154 than Trout is

Which says something about alvarez doesnt it? My point is not that trout is really good, my point is hes the type of fighter alvarez should be beating to show show hes the man that hes being advertised as. No one is calling trout great accept people that just hate on canelo but he is a more respectable win than old mosely, old baldmir and an outmatched 140 lb fighter. If canelo trashes him more power to him but hes never going to get respect fighting dead old fighters and guys like lopez.

[Shogunofharlem1]

Ryan Rhodes was a more proven fighter at 154 than Trout is

Which says something about alvarez doesnt it? My point is not that trout is really good, my point is hes the type of fighter alvarez should be beating to show show hes the man that hes being advertised as. No one is calling trout great accept people that just hate on canelo but he is a more respectable win than old mosely, old baldmir and an outmatched 140 lb fighter. If canelo trashes him more power to him but hes never going to get respect fighting dead old fighters and guys like lopez.

[richardt]

Calling Trout, or any fighter who is in the top 1-2% of the world a "Bum" really exposes someone's lack of respect and knowledge of Boxing. So let me guess, you are in the top 1-2% of the world at what you do for a living??? If not, that makes you worse than a bum by your own designations.