your post is embarrassing, one of the most inept analyses of a heavyweight talent i've ever seen. but who'd expect different from one who figured David Price was the better bet of the two to succeed.
at least those of us who rate Fury have, in past threads, lengthily detailed the gradual technical and athletic improvement we perceive in Fury.
here's a typical example of your great insight, "How this joke hasn't been exposed yet is beyond me." without realizing it, you're acknowledging that Fury is much better than you believed he was. which doesn't say much for your powers of discernment.
at least those of us who rate Fury have, in past threads, lengthily detailed the gradual technical and athletic improvement we perceive in Fury.
here's a typical example of your great insight, "How this joke hasn't been exposed yet is beyond me." without realizing it, you're acknowledging that Fury is much better than you believed he was. which doesn't say much for your powers of discernment.

Comment