Eddie Chambers wants to fight Pulev!

[Weltschmerz]

So in other words you agree with the current trend of top heavyweight contenders avoiding other contenders. Nice. Its fans like you that enable this era to be the worst ever.

eh.... no.... that's not what I said at all, sherlock

[JAB5239]

eh.... no.... that's not what I said at all, sherlock

Its not? You're condoning one contender not fighting another, how else should it be interpreted? You seemed to be ok with the idea of a Pulev-Adamek fight till Tomasz didn't want it. Why not a fight with the guy who arguably beat him with one arm?

[Weltschmerz]

Its not? You're condoning one contender not fighting another, how else should it be interpreted? You seemed to be ok with the idea of a Pulev-Adamek fight till Tomasz didn't want it. Why not a fight with the guy who arguably beat him with one arm?

If Chambers beats Adamek first, then sure.

[JAB5239]

If Chambers beats Adamek first, then sure.

Why does he have to beat Adamek? He arguably beat him with one arm and Adamek want no part of Pulev. Its only logical he take on chambers. It was ok with you when Vits fought Chisora who was coming off a loss, so why the double standard?

[Weltschmerz]

Why does he have to beat Adamek? He arguably beat him with one arm and Adamek want no part of Pulev. Its only logical he take on chambers. It was ok with you when Vits fought Chisora who was coming off a loss, so why the double standard?

You're running a bit off topic once again with your Vitali obsession, but Chisora was openly robbed vs Helenius, while Adamek beat Chambers fair and square.

Bottom line, Pulev doesn't need to waste his time on a guy like Chambers, whom he would beat easily.

[JAB5239]

You're running a bit off topic once again with your Vitali obsession, but Chisora was openly robbed vs Helenius, while Adamek beat Chambers fair and square.

Bottom line, Pulev doesn't need to waste his time on a guy like Chambers, whom he would beat easily.

I'm not off topic at all, I'm showing your double standard. And you just proved me right in saying you condone contenders avoiding each other by saying Pulev doesn't need to waste his time. In essence you just said its ok if one guy doesn't fight another if YOU think he can beat him. I find that hysterical since you're so eager to criticize Haye when in fact he does the same thing you say Pulev should do. Like I said, your agenda and double standards are endless!

[Weltschmerz]

I'm not off topic at all, I'm showing your double standard. And you just proved me right in saying you condone contenders avoiding each other by saying Pulev doesn't need to waste his time. In essence you just said its ok if one guy doesn't fight another if YOU think he can beat him. I find that hysterical since you're so eager to criticize Haye when in fact he does the same thing you say Pulev should do. Like I said, your agenda and double standards are endless!

I honestly don't know what you're trying to convince me of, but I have no double standards or agendas.

If you just look at it straight, what I said was, Adamek beat Chambers, so Pulev doesn't need to fight Chambers. Why should he? As I said, Pulev just has bigger fish to fry at the moment, that's all. Chambers is irrelevant. That's all there's to it.

You're winding yourself up and making up things again, you poor bastard.

[JAB5239]

I honestly don't know what you're trying to convince me of, but I have no double standards or agendas.

If you just look at it straight, what I said was, Adamek beat Chambers, so Pulev doesn't need to fight Chambers. Why should he? As I said, Pulev just has bigger fish to fry at the moment, that's all. Chambers is irrelevant. That's all there's to it.

You're winding yourself up and making up things again, you poor bastard.

Lol, you have no double standards? Its ok Vits fought a guy coming off a loss but Pulev can't do the same? Its ok Pulev doesn't have to fight another top contender but its not ok for Haye? Chambers is irrelevant because you say so? Son, don't you ever get tired of me exposing your ridiculousness? You would condone one top fighter you root for not fighting another top fighter you don't root for. You seek to give passes to your favorites while criticizing other fighters for doing the SAME EXACT THING. Those aren't double standards? Why don't you break it down and explain it to us?

(Cue the insults and excuses)

[NEETzsche]

chambers would be a good test for pulev. possibly a stylistic nightmare too.

[Weltschmerz]

Lol, you have no double standards? Its ok Vits fought a guy coming off a loss but Pulev can't do the same? Its ok Pulev doesn't have to fight another top contender but its not ok for Haye? Chambers is irrelevant because you say so? Son, don't you ever get tired of me exposing your ridiculousness? You would condone one top fighter you root for not fighting another top fighter you don't root for. You seek to give passes to your favorites while criticizing other fighters for doing the SAME EXACT THING. Those aren't double standards? Why don't you break it down and explain it to us?

(Cue the insults and excuses)

I have no double standards.
Vitali fought Chisora because K2 felt Chisora did very well against Helenius and possibly deserved the victory in that fight. Plus Chisora was considered a dangerous contender at that time, so Vitali honorably gave him the shot.

Pulev, as I explain now for the third fourth time, doesn't need to fight a guy like Chambers, as he really has little reason to at this stage in his career.

As to why you bring Haye into this argument, I don't know. There are different fighters and situations, you know.

You seem to have some angry agenda going on. My advise, switch off your computer and get some rest. You need it.