I scored Hopkins vs Tavoris Cloud a draw and some people told me Hopkins "totally dominated and destroyed" Cloud. Which is completely ridiculous.
And now I want to know: if a fighter destroys another fighter and dominates him with ease, then I am sure there must be a lot of ROUNDS which he dominated, right?
I mean, there must be quite some rounds in which Hopkins was beating Cloud all over the ring, Cloud hanging on for dear life, right?
So here is what I say to those who say Hopkins totally dominated the fight: TELL ME WHICH ROUND OF THE WHOLE FIGHT DID HOPKINS WIN MOST CLEARLY? WHICH ROUND IS IT THAT HOPKINS DOMINATED THE MOST?
Because I would like to know that, because in my opinion out of all the 12 rounds there is NOT A SINGLE ROUND which Hopkins "clearly dominated".
And then I am asking myself - if a fighter doesn't even win one single round in dominant fashion, then how the heck did he "dominate" the whole fight??
So just post that one round which Hopkins dominated the most.
And now I want to know: if a fighter destroys another fighter and dominates him with ease, then I am sure there must be a lot of ROUNDS which he dominated, right?
I mean, there must be quite some rounds in which Hopkins was beating Cloud all over the ring, Cloud hanging on for dear life, right?
So here is what I say to those who say Hopkins totally dominated the fight: TELL ME WHICH ROUND OF THE WHOLE FIGHT DID HOPKINS WIN MOST CLEARLY? WHICH ROUND IS IT THAT HOPKINS DOMINATED THE MOST?
Because I would like to know that, because in my opinion out of all the 12 rounds there is NOT A SINGLE ROUND which Hopkins "clearly dominated".
And then I am asking myself - if a fighter doesn't even win one single round in dominant fashion, then how the heck did he "dominate" the whole fight??
So just post that one round which Hopkins dominated the most.
Comment