Who's the smarter fighter? Hopkins or Floyd?
Collapse
-
-
This is a good description of Mayweather.
Not sure about this.Nard on the otherhand is close to ******ed you could say...there were many fights where they were no good for him but he took them like he doesn't know a jack ****.
Hopkins had to take them, he didn't have the star power of a Mayweather or a Jones Jr.
Another difference is B-Hop wasn't obsessively protecting an undefeated record, his boxrec says he lost his first fight.Comment
-
I think Hopkins is the smarter fighter. Winning fights at 48 years old because of little more than your ring smarts is unbelievable.Comment
-
Mayweather has longevity.
Mayweather's been a pro 17 years, been in the P4P list almost all of those years. There is not many that can rival that.
Don't forget, Hopkins started a lot later than Mayweather did age wise.
I'm not saying Mayweather has the longevity of Hopkins because he doesn't but Mayweather's longevity in the sport is also an incredible feat.Comment
-
if you mean smart in terms of tech nous, then Bernard.
if you mean smart in terms of being successful, then Money.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I'd say Hopkins. I'm not knocking Floyd But for a 48 year old man to be able to fight like that without getting hurt is ****ing amazing. I was shocked how well he made cloud miss by doing the littlest things. Mayweather is smart but as he gets older he's fighting less smart it seems. That's just how I see it as of now my opinion may change
Comment
....it's obviously Floyd duh. Floyd is obviously the smarter fighter here, when a fight is to dangerous Floyd know its not good for him. He'll duck and dodge, whatever it takes...even retiring to get pass by.
Comment