Oh god... so Paulie/Broner approved?
Collapse
-
Proven against who? 2 mediocre LWs who were ranked in the bottom of top 10 in a weak division and A huge upset win against Martinez who wasnt that highly ranked as well
It would be probably be his best win but Burns isnt a great fighter, he's proven to be a good fighterComment
-
im pretty sure thats his point. smh. who are the great fighters from 135 to 147, name them? saying burns has proven to be a good fighter is not an insult.Proven against who? 2 mediocre LWs who were ranked in the bottom of top 10 in a weak division and A huge upset win against Martinez who wasnt that highly ranked as well
It would be probably be his best win but Burns isnt a great fighter, he's proven to be a good fighterComment
-
This might be a cherrypick Team Broner will regret having. Paulie will trash you like you've never been trashed before. LOL. He might even beat you if you have that stationary style. This is not an easy fight as long as PM is in great physical shape.Comment
-
Comment
-
his point is what is not true? because everything dan said is a fact. if your insult to burns is hes not a great fighter, then thats not much of an insult. burns is proven. hes world level and hes a legit champion. im surprised ppl would actually argue against that.Comment
-
-
Point im trying to make is that Burns is not a great fighter, just about everybody who ranked top 10 in a division has proven to be "good". This fascination with Broner facing him is a head scratcher because he is a very average fighter in just about every way, including resume. There are better options from 135-147. Hell at 135 Vasquez, Burns and Abril are all at the same level yet everyone wants ricky burns for Broner. Why?
My post wasnt pointed at Broner but at there is this myth that Burns is some great fighter, he's notComment
Comment