Why the Garcia hate??

[Bretty Poy32]

he wears skinny jeans and trying to be a rapper.

[Mr. Philadel]

he stopped Khan and Morales....Khan has a army of fans here...the Mexicans run deep plus Morales is a legend and not many fans like to see a legend get hit hard unless his name is Hopkins....thats my explanation for the unwarranted hate he recieves

[SlySlickSmooth]

People underrate him just because he beat an old man x2 in a year and "lucky" punched Khan for a title. He's got skills and is improving. I know he can get a stoppage against Judah as well.

[Cuban Linx]

He's perceived as a fluke.

[Craveman]

He exposed my hero Khan...

[New England]

khan was my hero.

in addition, his father is not a likable character. he's with al haymon, and is favored by the networks and his promotor on those grounds.


and finally, there are some goofballs who genuinely believe that amir khan is "the better fighter" and that garcia won because of choices amir made deliberately (fighting the wrong fight,) and luck. we call those people "wrong."

[bojangles1987]

Dude deal with the fact that Matt's lost first..That will help you understand why fact is Garcia is the Champ at 140lb..Yes it is your opinion..Facts are Peterson was removed from the rankings making Khan the num 1 fighter at the weight..Garcia was moved up because he held a belt and was the most deserving fighter around the num 2 spot at that moment..Deal with it,Matt's did not win against Devon..When you first deal with that fact(Fact)you'll then be ok with the Fact(again a fact)that Garcia is the Champion at 140lb..Deal with it already hater..

Oh and btw,I hated that Khan vs Garcia was for the ring belt..But I also don't think my opinion can change the fact that it was...

I like talking to you Rome, and as two of the few Bradley fans we have to stick together, but it drives me crazy how you don't acknowledge robberies. I know your opinion is that there's nothing we can do about it, its in the record books as a win, but that doesn't mean you have to pretend that the fighter who benefited from the robbery actually won. Alexander did not beat Matthysse, no matter what a few incompetent/corrupt judges said.

[Rome-By-Ko]

.

I like talking to you Rome, and as two of the few Bradley fans we have to stick together, but it drives me crazy how you don't acknowledge robberies. I know your opinion is that there's nothing we can do about it, its in the record books as a win, but that doesn't mean you have to pretend that the fighter who benefited from the robbery actually won. Alexander did not beat Matthysse, no matter what a few incompetent/corrupt judges said.

Bo you my dude as well,I usually learn something new or getting a different view of things each time chopping it up with you..It's not that I don't acknowledge that robberies happen..I just choose to also acknowledge the outcome of a fight add well..

What the hell is a robbery nowa days anyways..I've heard people say Peterson vs Ortiz was a robbery..Which IMO it wasn't..Khan vs Peterson PAC vs Bradley were both called robberies, PAC vs Marquez(all of them) was called a robbery I truly don't agree..Even the Alexander fight,I had Matts winning, but not by much,I could understand how someone could see Alexander winning..Hell people even called Matts vs Judah a robbery which it's ridicules, real talk...

Just because the fighter who most wanted to see win does not get the nod does not make out a robbery..The only fight I thought was a robbery was Pwill vs Lara tbh..That's what a robbery looks like imo..

It's part of the rules puff the sport that the elected officials will have the final say on who wins and loses a fight..Now we can all have an opinion, that's a great part of boxing..But we also have to respect the judges who were elected decision as well is my main point..

Like crushing, he believes that Garcia is not the undisputed champ, but that's an opinion, fact is he is..Facts are also Matts did not win his two biggest fights..regardless how i felt about the fight, it did not happen the way i saw it..IMO for me not to acknowledge the outcome is worse then me not acknowledging the fighter I thought won might have been jobbed..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Sorry for some miss spelled words its this damn phone..

[Russian Crushin]

.

Bo you my dude as well,I usually learn something new or getting a different view of things each time chopping it up with you..It's not that I don't acknowledge that robberies happen..I just choose to also acknowledge the outcome of a fight add well..

What the hell is a robbery nowa days anyways..I've heard people say Peterson vs Ortiz was a robbery..Which IMO it wasn't..Khan vs Peterson PAC vs Bradley were both called robberies, PAC vs Marquez(all of them) was called a robbery I truly don't agree..Even the Alexander fight,I had Matts winning, but not by much,I could understand how someone could see Alexander winning..Hell people even called Matts vs Judah a robbery which it's ridicules, real talk...

Just because the fighter who most wanted to see win does not get the nod does not make out a robbery..The only fight I thought was a robbery was Pwill vs Lara tbh..That's what a robbery looks like imo..

It's part of the rules puff the sport that the elected officials will have the final say on who wins and loses a fight..Now we can all have an opinion, that's a great part of boxing..But we also have to respect the judges who were elected decision as well is my main point..

Like crushing, he believes that Garcia is not the undisputed champ, but that's an opinion, fact is he is..Facts are also Matts did not win his two biggest fights..regardless how i felt about the fight, it did not happen the way i saw it..IMO for me not to acknowledge the outcome is worse then me not acknowledging the fighter I thought won might have been jobbed..

He is not the undisputed champ at 140 Nor is he lineal

No matter how many times you say it, it won make it true