Peoples idea of cherry picking is open to interpretation.
But the way i see things is Floyd is the laughing stock of boxing, as he hardly fights. So for Floyd to shut people up hes got to do something amazing but fighting Guerrero isnt amazing. Its a good test for Floyd as Floyd isnt as good as some make out, but Guerrero is a nice name to pad out Floyds resume which certainly needs padding out, as its a little bare of late.
Its definately a cherry pick though as arguably most would think Trout is more dangerous an opponent as would Canelo be, not to mention Sergio at 160. If you fight the people want you to fight, then its not a cherry pick. Not many people would have put Guerreros name forward as the most dangerous opponent though.
Some accuse Pac of cherry picking,(but arent taken seriously) but when you fight as often as Pac you are afforded priviledges that people who like long layoffs and taking it easy arent given or entitled to.
But come on, Pacs opponents are hardly cherry picks.
But the way i see things is Floyd is the laughing stock of boxing, as he hardly fights. So for Floyd to shut people up hes got to do something amazing but fighting Guerrero isnt amazing. Its a good test for Floyd as Floyd isnt as good as some make out, but Guerrero is a nice name to pad out Floyds resume which certainly needs padding out, as its a little bare of late.
Its definately a cherry pick though as arguably most would think Trout is more dangerous an opponent as would Canelo be, not to mention Sergio at 160. If you fight the people want you to fight, then its not a cherry pick. Not many people would have put Guerreros name forward as the most dangerous opponent though.
Some accuse Pac of cherry picking,(but arent taken seriously) but when you fight as often as Pac you are afforded priviledges that people who like long layoffs and taking it easy arent given or entitled to.
But come on, Pacs opponents are hardly cherry picks.
Comment