Who is the better boxer Mathysse or Peterson?

[Bushbaby]

I'd say Peterson possess better movement. But Lucas is better at pressure, (which they both bring).

[Rome-By-Ko]

We're not talking about someone having their way with Bradley here. He has an ugly style and its hard to do or look good vs him, same as Alexander. But we're talking about KOs and KDs. I know how the top level works but top level fighters with good power still find ways to KO or KD their opponents. Not in every single fight but you can tell when a fighter possesses power. Bradley punches sloppy and wide thats why he has no power. Someone like Mayweather has low KO percentage but you can tell he has the power to get his opponents attention and respect. He has what I call "stingy" power. You know when something doesn't hurt but it stings and bothers you.

Matthysse didn't KO Alexander but still got him on his ass LEGITAMELY. Who else has done that? IDC who you're fighting but when you get 20 KDs in 8 fights or whatever the numbers are, that's POWER.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I've never said,Matt's then not have power..But to say Bradley has none is straight dumb(no offense)..Bradley fights nothing like Alexander,Alexander holds,Bradley does not..Looping punches,bad technique or not,Bradley does not hold and exchanges with every opponent I've ever seen him fight..Yet nobody(and I mean nobody)has rushed in on him..When an opponent does not respect ya power,that's exactly what happens..I don't care how ugly your style is..

[Rome-By-Ko]

A better "boxer" on here is the guy who's style is most like the "one taught in gyms" aka technicality, basically looking cute.

Prime example is Paulie, he's a master boxer but sucks major ass

Paulie a Master boxer..WTF

[Phenom]

Well, that doesn't make him a master boxer.

And Pauli is a better "boxer" than Cano.

Doesn't mean he's a better fighter in general, though.

don't think most people understand that here

[Godsfly]

obviously peterson (by a long shot)

say what you want but when peterson outboxes & makes mathysse look silly people are gonna go into a turd rage on here................the entire forum is probably gonna get shut down.

[Russian Crushin]

I know you don't like him but Paulie is a damn good boxer. He's just past it and lost to the much fresher and harder puncher. He just doesn't have his legs anymore or else I believe that fight would've been a little different.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

He got outboxed by a raw 140 fighter who's slow and telegraphs his punches. Anyone is a harder puncher then paulie

[Rome-By-Ko]

And lost all those fights. Also Khan is "strong in the clinch". WHat does that mean?

You don't know what a clinch is??Or the word strong??

If Khan does not wanna exchange,he can hold on and prevent it..Similar to what Alexander did to both Maidana and Matt's...Clear enough I hope..

Oh btw,Peterson did not lose all those fights..

[Rome-By-Ko]

You're acting like Peterson is the smallest guy at 140. This dude is 5'9" and on PEDs. Did you see his physique Friday? He's about to be put on his ass by little Matthysse, that's all I know.



Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

You maybe right,I'm not saying Peterson would win this fight..But I'm leaning towards him..

[Scarcaztic]

You don't know what a clinch is??Or the word strong??

If Khan does not wanna exchange,he can hold on and prevent it..Similar to what Alexander did to both Maidana and Matt's...Clear enough I hope..

How does that tie into the Matthysse fight? Matthysse will be ****ing with him.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I dont know, judging by the Khan fight, nobody would call his defense "responsible". Lamont gets him plenty

Khan is a very fast handed fighter,Matt's is not..Oh and Peterson was very defensively sound in the Khan fight..But I know a lot of people are down on Khan now(oddly enough the same ones that was singing his praises before)but he is a very good fighter..Oh and one that(I don't believe even you)many did not give Peterson a chance to beat...