Guillermo Rigondeaux; FACTS!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Amateur means nothing in the pros. Miguel Cotto beat down an opponent which he lost to in the amateurs. Didn't Roy Jones beat Tarver in the amateurs but you saw what happen in the pros.Comment
-
Comment
-
Rigo won his first gold medal at the age of twenty. Naturally, a fighter going for a second or third Olympic championship will encounter some younger or more inexperienced opponents. But to say that's their reason for success is at the very least misguided.Comment
-
Well lets be real here...Donaire is the one with a loss, not Rigo. Rigo has been fighting guys his own size too unlike Donaire.Comment
-
I can see either guy winning a decision or losing by KO. Donaire has a slight size advantage, while Rigo is faster and has more responsible defense. The two question marks are Rigo's punch resistance and Donaire's patience/focus. Can Rigo withstand enough punishment to get the W? Can Nonito maintain his focus if Rigo begins to dictate the tempo and is getting the better of him? It'll probably turn into a slow and boring fight, but I'm not going into this fight with the mindset of being entertained. I expect a slow chess match.Comment
-
-
Roy never fought Tarver in the AMs to my knowledge as for Cotto's losses, he literally was a kid. Hell the guy lost to tiny little Ivan Calderon in the ams!
Yeah amateur boxing pedigrees don't mean zilch right?
You may name a few but in most cases most successful amateurs go on to have very good success in the pros.
Roy, Oscar, Foreman, Ali, Wlad, Frazier, Tyszu etc etc all had extensive amateur backgrounds
In fact go look at every top guy of each division, just about everyone was a damn good amateur with the exception of maybe Sergio Martinez. Donaire himself was a good amateur and defeated James Kirkland lol (no joke)Comment
Comment