Is a win for kell brook better than any of khans wins?
Collapse
-
-
Earl was done and everyone knew it, the war with Katsidis took it all out of him. Gomez was blown up and also at the end of his road, was coming off taking punishment and being flattened in a domestic war with 'Ingemar' at 130 late the previous year. Limond was another blown up guy, featherfisted and EBU/Commonwealth level at best. they were good opponents for Khan at that formative stage of his career, though.Khan has fought the better fighters from a very young age though, so it's understandable that he is not undefeated.
Prescott, Kotelnyk, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Garcia.
Earl, Gomez, Limond were about as good a win as Brook's current best win over Carson Jones IMHO.
if Kell has an opponent/stepping stone on his record of equivalent worth to those guys, Michael Jennings would be somewhat closer to a match.
Jones is a prime guy who had shown a lot of improvement after teaming with Sanchez and coming down to welter, climbing the sanctioning body's rankings. he's yet to prove he's more than a gatekeeper to world class, but he was certainly a more formidable opponent than those you mentioned for Khan.Last edited by S. Saddler 1310; 01-18-2013, 02:01 PM.Comment
-
Respect ya view bro,but let's be real..Fighters are looked at for accomplishments as they should be..Since you want to look at who they beat,that still gives Alexander an edge bro...Alexander beat Matt's Kottie Maidana Urango and Bailey..Maidana and Kottie have nothing on their resume that good,so weather it's belts or just resume Alexander trumps both of them bro..Based off of facts...Comment
-
all things considered, yes, Devon would be the best single win Khan and Kell would have between them. you can come up with favourable triangulations involving Alexander for both Khan and Devon (Khan handled Kotelnik whom Devon struggled with and should've lost to, Devon handled Maidana more easily than Khan), but the truth is he would be the most accomplished fighter that either Khan or Kell would have beaten.Comment
-
I simply refuse to give credit to Alexander for Matthysse or Kotelnik. He did not beat either of them, and I don't care what the record says. Kotelnik and Maidana were the same caliber fighter as Alexander now.Respect ya view bro,but let's be real..Fighters are looked at for accomplishments as they should be..Since you want to look at who they beat,that still gives Alexander an edge bro...Alexander beat Matt's Kottie Maidana Urango and Bailey..Maidana and Kottie have nothing on their resume that good,so weather it's belts or just resume Alexander trumps both of them bro..Based off of facts...Comment
-
See Bo,this is big picture right here...all things considered, yes, Devon would be the best single win Khan and Kell would have between them. you can come up with favourable triangulations involving Alexander for both Khan and Devon (Khan handled Kotelnik whom Devon struggled with and should've lost to, Devon handled Maidana more easily than Khan), but the truth is he would be the most accomplished fighter that either Khan or Kell would have beaten.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment