is Samuel Peter the heir apparent?

**jpboxer3** · 01-10-2005, 12:13 PM

I couldn't really tell even after his KO win over Jeremy Williams because Williams was a smallish heavyweight who was already known to have glass-jaw. After his scheduled fight with Yanqui Diaz January 22nd,we'l know whether or not he is the real thing.Diaz is another big strong Heavyweight prospect who I think will give Sam Peter alot of problems in the ring.

**dansweeney** · 01-10-2005, 12:19 PM

Originally posted by jpboxer3

I couldn't really tell even after his KO win over Jeremy Williams because Williams was a smallish heavyweight who was already known to have glass-jaw. After his scheduled fight with Yanqui Diaz January 22nd,we'l know whether or not he is the real thing.Diaz is another big strong Heavyweight prospect who I think will give Sam Peter alot of problems in the ring.

ya, i cant wait for that fight, if he kayo's diaz in spectacular fashion that would really make a statement in the heavy division, if he does that id like to see him knock ruiz into retirement

**Neuraxis** · 01-10-2005, 12:21 PM

Diaz is a nobody, and Peter is clearly not the heir apparent.

**elveiel** · 01-10-2005, 01:07 PM

No, Vitali's top dog.

Vitali looks pretty easy to beat because of his style but he's not, he's far stronger than any other heavy and uses his height very well.

I think Peter's a contender at best.

**tri4ben2** · 01-10-2005, 01:36 PM

Why are you asking this? Are you going to bring this up in 5 years and say "Ha Ha you were wrong"?

give the poor guy some time to develop, and the answer will be clear.

People used to say that Michael Grant was the heir apparent, but we saw what happened to that.

**elveiel** · 01-10-2005, 01:41 PM

Originally posted by tri4ben2

Why are you asking this? Are you going to bring this up in 5 years and say "Ha Ha you were wrong"?

give the poor guy some time to develop, and the answer will be clear.

People used to say that Michael Grant was the heir apparent, but we saw what happened to that.

People said Wlad was the heir apparent

**dansweeney** · 01-10-2005, 02:07 PM

Originally posted by Neuraxis

Diaz is a nobody, and Peter is clearly not the heir apparent.

oh its klitschko boy again, your opinion is completely bias so i dont think anybody wants to hear what you have to say, you are just scared that peter will kayo your man vitali

**dansweeney** · 01-10-2005, 02:08 PM

Originally posted by tri4ben2

Why are you asking this? Are you going to bring this up in 5 years and say "Ha Ha you were wrong"?

give the poor guy some time to develop, and the answer will be clear.

People used to say that Michael Grant was the heir apparent, but we saw what happened to that.

hey *******, the heavy division stinks and im bringing up a question about a young fighter that looks promising, if you dont like the thread then dont read it ****head, **** you

**Neuraxis** · 01-10-2005, 02:51 PM

Originally posted by dansweeney

oh its klitschko boy again, your opinion is completely bias so i dont think anybody wants to hear what you have to say, you are just scared that peter will kayo your man vitali

I'm sorry to be the one to break this to you, but if Peter can't KO glass chinned Shufford or Pudar he isn't going to KO Vitali.

is Samuel Peter the heir apparent?