And he's STILL fighting. I know some fans feel like a fighter's legacy is set in stone and becomes impenetrable at a certain point, but I can't say I completely agree. Accomplishments are set in stone, but I think legacy can be damaged.
Analyzing a resume means taking every fight into consideration, the wins and the losses. Had he beaten Hatton, would he still have been viewed as a "shot" fighter? Him being over the hill doesn't mean that the fight didn't occur.
Do we pretend like RJJ's losses after his prime didn't happen? Hell, if Floyd loses to Guerrero or Canelo, will the excuse be that he was past-prime??
Analyzing a resume means taking every fight into consideration, the wins and the losses. Had he beaten Hatton, would he still have been viewed as a "shot" fighter? Him being over the hill doesn't mean that the fight didn't occur.
Do we pretend like RJJ's losses after his prime didn't happen? Hell, if Floyd loses to Guerrero or Canelo, will the excuse be that he was past-prime??

Comment