floyd beat cotto, trout beat cotto

[El Angel]

Floyd vs Trout is a more competitive fight than Guerrero.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Floyd vs Trout is a more competitive fight than Guerrero.

Its the fight that makes the most sense

[El Angel]

Its the fight that makes the most sense

I'm down for it, Floyd won't choose him because he doesn't draw though. A damn shame.

[happyman]

floyd-trout >>>>>floyd-guerrero

[Vasyl’s dad]

I'm down for it, Floyd won't choose him because he doesn't draw though. A damn shame.

I don't see why Floyd needs a draw. He's supposedly the face of boxing so needing a name opponent is irrelevant. Odlh fought many ppvs with a no name. Floyds apparently fighting rg who is basically an unknown. Fighting trout proves he really can draw with his own name without fighting a Latino.

But I seriously doubt it happens. Trout poses an actual threat like Margarito and Cotto in 08, paul Williams and pacquiao.

[Mr. Fantastic]

I don't see why Floyd needs a draw. He's supposedly the face of boxing so needing a name opponent is irrelevant. Odlh fought many ppvs with a no name. Floyds apparently fighting rg who is basically an unknown. Fighting trout proves he really can draw with his own name without fighting a Latino.

But I seriously doubt it happens. Trout poses an actual threat like Margarito and Cotto in 08, paul Williams and pacquiao.

@ your new name. Epic!!

[El Angel]

I don't see why Floyd needs a draw. He's supposedly the face of boxing so needing a name opponent is irrelevant. Odlh fought many ppvs with a no name. Floyds apparently fighting rg who is basically an unknown. Fighting trout proves he really can draw with his own name without fighting a Latino.

But I seriously doubt it happens. Trout poses an actual threat like Margarito and Cotto in 08, paul Williams and pacquiao.

Agree, Floyd shouldn't need a strong B side at all times to make money and draw fans. Trout is a better fight and more competitive.

I agree he poses a real threat to Floyd, Floyd would have his hands full with Trout. Now I wanna see this fight.

[studentofthegam]

Agree, Floyd shouldn't need a strong B side at all times to make money and draw fans. Trout is a better fight and more competitive.

I agree he poses a real threat to Floyd, Floyd would have his hands full with Trout. Now I wanna see this fight.

Let me get this right. Floyd should, in spite of the smart decision, take on a no name fighter to prove to y'all (lol) that he's a real main attraction without a Spanish opponent? In turn losing money and a real fan (me) because he's the dumbest mf alive. Now whose the real arrogant prick(s) Floyd or..........................

[El Angel]

Let me get this right. Floyd should, in spite of the smart decision, take on a no name fighter to prove to y'all (lol) that he's a real main attraction without a Spanish opponent? In turn losing money and a real fan (me) because he's the dumbest mf alive. Now whose the real arrogant prick(s) Floyd or..........................

So Floyd should always just takes the fight that makes him the most money, forgoing legacy and fighting best. You would stop supporting him because he took on a tougher challenge which wouldn't earn him as much money? Wow.

[happyman]

Let me get this right. Floyd should, in spite of the smart decision, take on a no name fighter to prove to y'all (lol) that he's a real main attraction without a Spanish opponent? In turn losing money and a real fan (me) because he's the dumbest mf alive. Now whose the real arrogant prick(s) Floyd or..........................

wait you would stop being a floyd fan if he fought trout? under what circumstances? that makes no sense to me. trout is a much tougher opponent than the former featherweight guerrero