Who have a better resume Oscar or floyd

[Rk16]

leonard fought 4 all time greats in or near their primes. floyd 0. it's close!

Leonard says himself that he waited til Hagler slowed down before he fought him

[daggum]

Leonard says himself that he waited til Hagler slowed down before he fought him

yeah that's why i said near prime. mayweather waited till cotto fell off a cliff before fighting him and we are still waiting on pac. hagler was still dominating middleweight and hadn't lost in over ten years.

[Optimistic]

De La Hoya.

[dc3383]

Oscar fought the overall better fighters; but a resume is a list of accomplishments and losing isn't a accomplishment sorry to tell anybody.

[onetwopunch]

DLH..has the better resume and its not even close.

[Thornton Melon]

A resume is a list of what you done so saying that losses don't count on a resume is idiotic.

ODLH resume is better and it isn't even close? You think Floyd would have ever fought Sweet Pea or a prime Trinidad or Quartey? Not to mention going up to MW to face a Hopkins or going down to face a prime Pacquaio. Also he has Vargas and the best Mosley there was. ODLH's resume is great.

[IronDanHamza]

Mayweather, obviously.

[-Kev-]

Of guys they actually beat? Mayweather.

All names regardless of wins or losses? De La Hoya of course.

A guy like Glen Johnson has an even better resume than both, if we're talking just who they fought.

Hopkins
Jones Jr
Dawson 2x
Tarver 2x
Gonzalez
Griffin
Froch
Bute
Harding
Sosa
Groves
Cloud
Woods 2x
Green
Ulrich
etc.

[IronDanHamza]

If a guy's resume is solely who they fought, then Oakland Billy Smith has one of the best resumes of all time.

Top 10, at worst.

[Larry the boss]

Floyd has the better wins.....easily

resume=wins