New Ring P4P Update
Collapse
-
-
The fact that Mares isn't there after his win against Moreno is very disappointing, and having Broner there is a travesty.Comment
-
LOL I bet they were itching to put canelo and khan in there. But they can't because it's too damn obvious. GBP is a joke. Mares and froch is not in there yet broner is?Comment
-
they did have mares at #10...but they replaced him with guerrero. i noticed that the ring top ten p4p rankings were okay before pac lost and then after the loss it's like they went full ******.Comment
-
It is tho. The way they are bumping fighters up like that is very biased. & yea mares is a GBP fighter but they need Guerrero there to promote the fight as a fight between 2 P4Pers
Soon we will see Canelo there it is only a matter of timeComment
-
It's biased yes, I agree. But it's not as biased as people make out.
If you hadn't seen the list and went off what peope said you'd expect 80% of the list being GBP fighters but it's only like what? 2 or 3?
And yeah, no doubt Canelo will be on there after May 4th. It's surprising Mares isn't on there to be honest because it's clear Oscar likes him a lot.Comment
-
Broner and Guerrero being on the list but Mares not is such a f***ing travesty. So much about p4p is opinion, but those two being on while Mares isn't is not opinion, it bullsh**, as much as I hate the man and the protection he gets in the ring.Comment
-
Don't forget Froch.
It really is a joke that Broner and Guererro are in there and Froch and Mares aren't.Comment
-
Yeah, that truley is a joke. Mares and Froch deserve to be on there more than almost anyone IMO.
I think Guererro is knocking on the door but he's not quite there yet. No way should he be in there over Mares and Froch but I can some-what understand it.
Broner?
That's absurd. And I like Broner.
Comment
Comment