Your thoughts on Sergio Martinez
Collapse
-
As I said in the other thread, I don't dislike Sergio Martinez I think he's a good fighter just a little overrated.
After the amazing year he had to 2010, I considered myself a fan of his.
It wasn't until he cherry picked Darren Barker that I started to go off him a little.
I still consider him one of the best fighters in the world.Comment
-
Murray's rankings: Ring #8, WBC #3, WBA #3, WBO #1. He's a former Commonwealth titlist. He had a draw vs. Sturm (who I considered the #2 MW at the time) and Sergio is coming off an injury. Murray is the same caliber of opponent (maybe even better) as Barker. Unlike when Sergio fought Barker, I actually know who Murray is. I don't think Murray is that bad of an opponent.Comment
-
Comment
-
You clearly have a bias against Macklin. Otherwise why would you bring up a fight he lost over six years ago in a different division. You also have to remember that Macklin isn't an old guy, he was probably green at the time being 23 or 24. The guy has gotten a lot better and more experienced since then and he's also much stronger physically. Further, Buddy McGirt has done a good job with him in his last few fights; the guy can now box and brawl.Comment
-
You clearly have a bias against Macklin. Otherwise why would you bring up a fight he lost over six years ago in a different division. You also have to remember that Macklin isn't an old guy, he was probably green at the time being 23 or 24. The guy has gotten a lot better and more experienced since then and he's also much stronger physically. Further, Buddy McGirt has done a good job with him in his last few fights; the guy can now box and brawl.I really don't have a bias against Macklin. Because I don't rate him I must have a bias against him? Why is that the recurring theme around here?
I've followed Macklins entire career and although he is a decent fighter he is not a very good fighter, IMO. He surprised me in the Sturm fight and should have got the W IMO which is again, why I give Martinez credit for that win because he was very unlucky to not get the W against the #2 in the division at the time.
He has improved since the Moore fight, sure. But not by too much. He still has a lot of weaknesses now that he had back then. But, he is more polished.
And Macklin can not box. He is not a good boxer.
One of the most false and ****** myths going around on this site.Comment
Comment