Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Rios Jabs Bradley Challenge: Eyes Pacquiao, Marquez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
    Definitely. If Tim can render Pacquiao ineffective he can do it to Rios with ease.
    r u serious. Pac was rendered ineffective? he won 10 of 12 rds. yeah he was real ineffective. other than 2 blind judges, everyone had Pac by clear and convincing victory. even mayweathers had pac winning easily - that tells u something

    Comment


    • #62
      Why does anyone even talk to "Bum Bum Rios" or "Bad Foot Bradley? They've both been handed Victories that they didnt earn and are both irrelevant to most. If they Fought Bradley would win a UD, but who even cares, that fight couldnt sell out a Rec Center,LMAO!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by rasdun View Post
        r u serious. Pac was rendered ineffective? he won 10 of 12 rds. yeah he was real ineffective. other than 2 blind judges, everyone had Pac by clear and convincing victory. even mayweathers had pac winning easily - that tells u something
        10 of 12 rounds? omfg! what a bunch of bull****

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
          All roads lead to Pacquiao
          and trails, paths, back alleys, short cuts, and long drive ways! :WORD:

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by rasdun View Post
            r u serious. Pac was rendered ineffective? he won 10 of 12 rds. yeah he was real ineffective. other than 2 blind judges, everyone had Pac by clear and convincing victory. even mayweathers had pac winning easily - that tells u something
            you have absolutely no idea what boxing is and how it works, and how it is scored.

            switch sports please

            Comment


            • #66
              I'd rather see Rios vs. Marquez.

              Comment


              • #67
                please. who cares whether bradley won "officially" when everyone wit two eyes saw him lose 10 of 12 rds. if they announced the decision the way they shouldve 118-110, then would you have as much of a problem wit the offer of alvarados.
                2nd. who cares if Pac has been fighting at 147 for 4 yrs. he cuts no weight and Rios cuts a ton of weight. they're they exact same size - if anything Rios is bigger. who else is ther for Pac to fight? Mayweather wont fight him and Guerrero would be a good challenge but he'll be fighting Mayweather - Plus TR and GB ridiculously wont work together anyway.
                Thats whats stupid; not a Pac-rios fight in the alternative. the fact that Mayweather is scared to fight a challenge and TR refuses to match their fighters with GB fighters

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by SpeedKillz View Post
                  you have absolutely no idea what boxing is and how it works, and how it is scored.

                  switch sports please
                  yeah. me and 99% of the boxing trainers, managers and promoters that all had pac winning by 6-8 pts. LMFAO

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by SpeedKillz View Post
                    you have absolutely no idea what boxing is and how it works, and how it is scored.

                    switch sports please
                    please tell me one respected boxing trainer or boxer that tought bradley won that fight

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by rasdun View Post
                      please tell me one respected boxing trainer or boxer that tought bradley won that fight

                      very few. but that doesnt change the fact that pac did not win the fight 10-2, you stan. pac won the fight without a doubt, but sayin he won 10 rounds to 2 is a fangirl statement, hence my statement about you, which seems to be still true...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP