Paulie Malignaggi: "Judge like Adalaide Byrd Should Stay Home"

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

at all the Adalaide hate. All the years I've been watching her score bouts, I've never known her to be thought of in such a manner.

[John Barron]

don't agree with 119-109 but, at the end of the day, she got the right winner. i don't agree with my man paulie's card either, no way that was a draw. it looked like a close fight from the inside. i saw trout being more effective landing and throwing more shots overall while cotto woo'd the crowd with a few left hooks to punctuate the action, i didn't see much else from him. she didn't either. byrd is one of the few decent judges left in the sport, imo. the ref was A1 last night too. would like to see more of him in big fights.

[UglyPug]

I had Trout winning 116-112, and to be honest I looked for rounds to give to Cotto...

Trout winning rounds 1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12.
Cotto winning rounds 3,4,5,6..

This proves how close the fight was. I had rounds 1-2 for Cotto.

Forgot exactly how I scored it, but I remember the first 7 rounds being close.

A draw would not be out of the question.

119-109 is ridiculous, and any judge giving Cotto only one round, should be shot on sight.

[UglyPug]

Hahahaha, here the ugly **** is. . . I've had turds better looking than her. ..

Here are a few doozies she's scored:

Lopez drawing with Pavlik; Hopkins beating Calzaghe. .. And now add the 119-109 card to her resume. . .

SHe should stay home jsut on the grounds of her putrid, repulsive physical appearance alone. . .

[bojangles1987]

So should judges like Paulie Malignaggi.

[NearHypnos]

I had Cotto only winning 2 rounds.. I round a 10-10.... The rest all Trout. Cotto did well in some rounds but only in spots. Trout fought the whole round which was the determining factor for me in some of the closer rounds.

[bojangles1987]

This proves how close the fight was. I had rounds 1-2 for Cotto.

Forgot exactly how I scored it, but I remember the first 7 rounds being close.

A draw would not be out of the question.

119-109 is ridiculous, and any judge giving Cotto only one round, should be shot on sight.

A draw is absolutely out of the question. Its every bit as bad as 119-109.

[IronDanHamza]

A draw is absolutely out of the question. Its every bit as bad as 119-109.

I don't even think it's a bad scorecard.

It's only 2 points off the majorty of peoples scorecard (117-111) and it's not like Cotto dominated any round.

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

This proves how close the fight was. I had rounds 1-2 for Cotto.

Forgot exactly how I scored it, but I remember the first 7 rounds being close.

A draw would not be out of the question.

119-109 is ridiculous, and any judge giving Cotto only one round, should be shot on sight.

Why Pug? What round did Cotto clearly win other than the 5th round. I scored 2 and 5 for him. Iron Dan gave him 2,4, and 5. But honestly 2 wasnt a great round for Miguel, I felt he did enough though. Round 4 he didnt do enough to keep the round, and let Trout take the round from him. And round 5 was the only round you can honestly say that Cotto imposed his will.

[IronDanHamza]

Why Pug? What round did Cotto clearly win other than the 5th round. I scored 2 and 5 for him. Iron Dan gave him 2,4, and 5. But honestly 2 wasnt a great round for Miguel, I felt he did enough though. Round 4 he didnt do enough to keep the round, and let Trout take the round from him. And round 5 was the only round you can honestly say that Cotto imposed his will.

I can't see anyway you could score Round 1 for Cotto either.