Who has better potential Adrien Broner or Peter "kid chocolate" Quillin?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #31
    Originally posted by puga
    broner..sorry but quillin just got outboxed 8-4....lucky for him he is a puncher...
    lol lucky for him? it's part of his game. It's like saying lucky mike tyson had power. silly.

    broner lost to Ponce. what's worse? Knocking down N'dam 6 times or getting a gift to Ponce? Broner hasn't proved anything yet.

    Comment

    • BigAlexSand
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 2325
      • 61
      • 68
      • 8,910

      #32
      I personally like both fights, quillin does have potential but I believe Broner has the potential to go to many places in the sport. Broners speed, athleticism, and accuracy will take to big places in the sport!

      Comment

      • Kagami Taiga
        Generation of Miracles
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 19078
        • 703
        • 228
        • 40,183

        #33
        undoubtedly broner. if only for the simpl fact that hes much younger than quillin and already hes of an equal level.

        Comment

        • Catch~Fade
          Banned
          • Oct 2012
          • 198
          • 11
          • 4
          • 288

          #34
          Broner of course.

          Comment

          • Cuauhtémoc1520
            Head Mexican in Charge
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 20824
            • 1,666
            • 569
            • 35,996

            #35
            Broner and it's not even close. I'm not trying to pull the trainer card but after the Sat fights we were talking the gym as to how bad a boxer Quillin really is.

            He has power and he has heart but he's lacking a lot of things like defense and he stands straight up. He's going to get caught very easily by someone with more skill and they really need to work on his stance and defense.

            He has good potential don't get me wrong, I just think Broner is a more natural fighter by a long shot.

            Comment

            • Sin City
              la mala vida
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 27551
              • 1,757
              • 2,208
              • 47,596

              #36
              I see Broner being a disappointment like Victor Ortiz was. I don't think Quillin will get too far. He doesn't have the skill set for it but I could see him being a solid contender for a while. He has massive pop.

              Comment

              • Snake...
                Banned
                • Aug 2011
                • 2167
                • 112
                • 27
                • 2,478

                #37
                Originally posted by Rip Chudd
                Sensitive? Not at all little guy, just find it funny how an armchair warrior such as yourself says that guys who have won championships in their sport suck. If that's the case then you must be a lot better then them right? Seems like you got a little sensitve when I said that. Good job bro.
                champions??? there paper champs who beat bums to win there belts

                Comment

                • Check
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 16585
                  • 677
                  • 132
                  • 26,287

                  #38
                  Originally posted by commodus
                  Golovkin with abel sanchez as his trainer and mentor will take over the MW division

                  i also see mikey garcia beating salido and gamboa
                  Broner sucks but you like Mikey Garcia as a prospect? I'd love to know why you feel Mikey Garcia is a good prospect, but Broner sucks.

                  Comment

                  • Check
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 16585
                    • 677
                    • 132
                    • 26,287

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Sin City
                    I see Broner being a disappointment like Victor Ortiz was. I don't think Quillin will get too far. He doesn't have the skill set for it but I could see him being a solid contender for a while. He has massive pop.
                    Quilin isn't very good but I don't see how Broner could be put into the Ortiz category. Coming up Ortiz was flawed as hell, I laughed when people had high expectations for him years ago. Broner on the other hand is very skilled. Yeah, maybe he did lose to PDL but that was due to inexperience and a huge step up. Broner has progressed since that fight. I think a lot of people will change their opinion about Broner when he beats Demarco down bad.

                    Comment

                    • Snake...
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 2167
                      • 112
                      • 27
                      • 2,478

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Check
                      Broner sucks but you like Mikey Garcia as a prospect? I'd love to know why you feel Mikey Garcia is a good prospect, but Broner sucks.
                      Mikey Garcia is technically sound and has no flaws

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP