Who has better potential Adrien Broner or Peter "kid chocolate" Quillin?
Collapse
-
I personally like both fights, quillin does have potential but I believe Broner has the potential to go to many places in the sport. Broners speed, athleticism, and accuracy will take to big places in the sport!Comment
-
undoubtedly broner. if only for the simpl fact that hes much younger than quillin and already hes of an equal level.Comment
-
-
Broner and it's not even close. I'm not trying to pull the trainer card but after the Sat fights we were talking the gym as to how bad a boxer Quillin really is.
He has power and he has heart but he's lacking a lot of things like defense and he stands straight up. He's going to get caught very easily by someone with more skill and they really need to work on his stance and defense.
He has good potential don't get me wrong, I just think Broner is a more natural fighter by a long shot.Comment
-
champions??? there paper champs who beat bums to win there beltsSensitive? Not at all little guy, just find it funny how an armchair warrior such as yourself says that guys who have won championships in their sport suck. If that's the case then you must be a lot better then them right? Seems like you got a little sensitve when I said that. Good job bro.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Quilin isn't very good but I don't see how Broner could be put into the Ortiz category. Coming up Ortiz was flawed as hell, I laughed when people had high expectations for him years ago. Broner on the other hand is very skilled. Yeah, maybe he did lose to PDL but that was due to inexperience and a huge step up. Broner has progressed since that fight. I think a lot of people will change their opinion about Broner when he beats Demarco down bad.Comment
Comment