Who has better potential Adrien Broner or Peter "kid chocolate" Quillin?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ElBossHogg™
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 4940
    • 260
    • 197
    • 5,720

    #21
    out of the two, why are we comparing the two to be honest? just wondering.

    I honestly cant say but if I had to bet Ill put my money on Peter LOL cause he in a weak division and Broner next stop at 140 would be hell for him.

    Comment

    • toshmurph
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 1439
      • 69
      • 122
      • 7,813

      #22
      You've got to go with Broner, potential wise he's what 22/23? Kid chocolate's 29 years of age. Quillin is very ordinary technique wise, he's just got a monster of a right hand

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #23
        Quillen is better.

        Broner hasn't fought a decent opponent and yet would have two losses with fair judging.

        Also, Quillen is in exciting fights because he goes for the KO, while Broner is dull to watch.
        Last edited by The Hammer; 10-26-2012, 10:21 AM.

        Comment

        • Light_Speed
          SPEED IS POWER
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 11518
          • 384
          • 1,427
          • 18,341

          #24
          Broner has the better boxing ability and conditioning but Quillin has more power P4P.

          Comment

          • junior gong
            snr gong
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2011
            • 11158
            • 1,160
            • 794
            • 18,973

            #25
            Both fighters have good potential, but I'm not convinced either will fully realise it. Quillin has a lot of strong competition in and around his weight, and Broner doesnt seem to have much intelligence to couple all his natural gifts.

            Not sure who is better, but I reckon Broner takes a loss first and it wont be a major surprise if that comes against DeMarco.

            Comment

            • MikeRo1972
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 1322
              • 80
              • 98
              • 7,641

              #26
              Broener. He gets hit less.

              Comment

              • Derranged
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 46593
                • 2,126
                • 1,350
                • 162,628

                #27
                Originally posted by puga
                whether people like it not , broner is the future gentlemen ..i dont like his ass too but kid is all talent...

                dont know if he's as b1tchass as his idol floyd tho....thats the only question and his chin
                For all that crap u talk of Floyd.. He was leagues ahead of Broner in his day. Two years as a pro he already dominated the top jlw. Broner got a gift against Ponce Deleon.

                Broner is overhyped as hell and I dont think he'll live up to it if he ever steps up in class.

                Comment

                • garfios
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 7320
                  • 1,550
                  • 3,109
                  • 29,740

                  #28
                  Quillin is only 27 years old and Broner look more polished, Peter has face better competition and Broner has two controversy wins, I really don't know who will be better, we have to wait and c who accomplishes more.

                  Comment

                  • 4Corners
                    Nothing But Sunshine
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 14441
                    • 485
                    • 83
                    • 25,167

                    #29
                    Broner is by far more naturally gifted. Quillin isn't bad or anything, bu t he's not nearly as fluid and sound in the ring.

                    Comment

                    • B.U.R.N.E.R
                      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 30197
                      • 1,346
                      • 400
                      • 47,475

                      #30
                      The one thats not pushing 30 obviously.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP