Who has the best resume: David Haye or Vitali Klitschko??

[IronDanHamza]

Vitali but it's not that wide to be honest.

[Sage84]

David Haye or Vitali Klitschko?

(I've indicated those who are past age 35 at the time of the fight)

Haye's best wins:

Audley Harrison age 39
John Ruiz age 38
Dereck Chisora prime
Monte Barrett age 38
Jean-Marc Mormeck age 37
Enzo Maccarinelli prime
Nicolay Valuev age 37

Vitali's best wins:

Sam Peter prime
Larry Donald age 36
Herbie Hide prime
Corrie Sanders age 38
Chris Arreola prime
JC Gomez age 35
Odlanier Solis prime
Tomasz Adamek prime
Danny Williams prime
Dereck Chisora prime
Albert Sosnowski prime
Shannon Briggs age 38
Orlin Norris age 37
Kirk Johnson prime
Timo Hoffmann prime

Although I agree with the list of names the fighters in bold were not in their primes.

Solis hasn't reached his prime yet and Adamek's prime was at CW. Hide had just left his prime by the time Vitali got him.

[Chris T Byrd]

they both have weak resumes, but Haye has the weaker one obviously, no need to make a thread to decide this

but of course we know it was only meant to diss Haye

[The Big Dunn]

that haye has a comparable resume should speak volumes. Look at vitali's list. Can anyone argue that is HOF worthy?

[4Corners]

Vitali obviously. But neither resume is a truly great or good resume.

Vitali will get into the HOF, but should he really based on his career and wins??? Not really....

Wlad has the better resume of the two Klitschko's by far.

There just weren't all that many good HW's in the Klitschko's era, and Vitali still has a weak resume based on his era. I mean Corrie Sanders, Tomasz Adamek, and Samuel Peter are his best wins??? That's pretty weak. Though their era was weaker than others, Wlad still managed to get Haye, Byrd, and Chagaev on his resume. Those are 3 pretty good and solid wins at those times.

[Jam Jars]

If you're talking about their whole resume not just HW. It's Haye.

[The Hammer]

Hide had just left his prime by the time Vitali got him.

No.

Hide is younger than Vitali. And he was just age 27 when they fought in June 1999.

Hide had 21 fights after he fought Vitali.

[Jam Jars]

No.

Hide is younger than Vitali. And he was just age 27 when they fought in June 1999.

Hide had 21 fights after he fought Vitali.

He was also prime when he lost to Chingangu 1 fight later. LOL

[The Hammer]

He was also prime when he lost to Chingangu 1 fight later.

That wasn't Hide's next fight, it was 2 1/2 years later.

Hide was 30 and Chingangu wasn't a bad fighter. He's age 45 now and still active:

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...7926&cat=boxer

And Hide avenged that loss two years later in 2003.

[4Corners]

Hide isn't even that good. He had a win over an old Tony Tucker. Why is everyone debating over Hide like he was that good??? He beat a no name to win his title, got KO'd in 6 rounds by Bowe, beat an old Tucker for a vacant title, than got beaten by Vitali.

Meanwhile, we have people sitting here talking about him being prime or not prime as if he's some sort of really good win or some s**t.