were old school fighters really complte fighters like they say

[transportcd]

on hbo and espn they are always saying that the old school fighters were complete fighters what timezone are they talking about 50's 60's 70's or 80's?

[puga]

no, most of them were primitive ..look at harry greb , the guy fought like a kangaroo.. even charlie z is more skilled than that mofoker

[IronDanHamza]

Same as every era;

Some were, some weren't.

[Japanese Boxing]

no, most of them were primitive ..look at harry greb , the guy fought like a kangaroo.. even charlie z is more skilled than that mofoker

lolwatteh***isdissh|t

[shadeyfizzle]

When I think of this topic I thin. k of the people that talk about the lost art of inside fighting that floyd is a complete fighter because he fights well inside while simultaneously trashing every freddie roach fighter for their lack of an inside game.

All I have to say about it is even muhammad the greatest of all time ali had absolutely no answers inside against frazier.

[subhuman]

no, most of them were primitive ..look at harry greb , the guy fought like a kangaroo.. even charlie z is more skilled than that mofoker

Charlie Z probably could knock him out.

[Ggurts si kab]

Yes and no.

[STREET CLEANER]

15 rounds fights, only one or two titles, 8 weight classes and fighting very frequent. Guys were obligated to learn their craft. In all eras there are great fighters.

[totalstranga]

no, most of them were primitive ..look at harry greb , the guy fought like a kangaroo.. even charlie z is more skilled than that mofoker

where'd you see footage of an actual Greb fight? I should red K you

[dan_cov]

no, most of them were primitive ..look at harry greb , the guy fought like a kangaroo.. even charlie z is more skilled than that mofoker

There is no footage of Greb fighting, only limited training footage?