As several people have already stated, only two people truly know what happened on the night in question. For the sake of discussion, I'll offer my two cents:
Years ago, I believed Mike Tyson was railroaded. I no longer feel that way. I'm not convinced, but I lean much more toward the belief that Tyson did what he was convicted of.
Clearly, Desiree Washington should not have gone up to Tyson's room at all, especially at such a late hour. But is it so far-fetched that an 18 year-old girl from a small town in Rhode Island could be so naive?
Tyson was regarded in a very different light from what we know today. He was this giggly kid who was seen as so wholesome that he was doing Pepsi commercials and selling video games with his name on them. Anybody remember that? This was, of course, before the conviction, the infamous "Oprah" interview and Tyson's very public baring of his inner-self.
As far as I know, Desiree never sought any kind of financial gain or exposure from her fateful encounter with Mike Tyson. In fact, I'll bet that many of the members here couldn't recall her name before they read it in this post. (This is fairly uncommon in this day and age, where everyone is trying to "get paid," no matter how humiliating their story.)
I tend to agree with some of the people that speculate Tyson is capable of admitting his crime publicly after all these years. He seems truly remorseful for his past life, calling himself a "pig" and a "piece of ****." (Does that sound like someone incapable of ****?)
Tyson may very well believe he never ****d Desiree, or even be in denial about it. In his mind, the very fact that a young woman came up to his hotel room at a late hour could very well have meant she was consenting to sex. If that's the case, his thinking explains his actions, but it doesn't excuse them.
Years ago, I believed Mike Tyson was railroaded. I no longer feel that way. I'm not convinced, but I lean much more toward the belief that Tyson did what he was convicted of.
Clearly, Desiree Washington should not have gone up to Tyson's room at all, especially at such a late hour. But is it so far-fetched that an 18 year-old girl from a small town in Rhode Island could be so naive?
Tyson was regarded in a very different light from what we know today. He was this giggly kid who was seen as so wholesome that he was doing Pepsi commercials and selling video games with his name on them. Anybody remember that? This was, of course, before the conviction, the infamous "Oprah" interview and Tyson's very public baring of his inner-self.
As far as I know, Desiree never sought any kind of financial gain or exposure from her fateful encounter with Mike Tyson. In fact, I'll bet that many of the members here couldn't recall her name before they read it in this post. (This is fairly uncommon in this day and age, where everyone is trying to "get paid," no matter how humiliating their story.)
I tend to agree with some of the people that speculate Tyson is capable of admitting his crime publicly after all these years. He seems truly remorseful for his past life, calling himself a "pig" and a "piece of ****." (Does that sound like someone incapable of ****?)
Tyson may very well believe he never ****d Desiree, or even be in denial about it. In his mind, the very fact that a young woman came up to his hotel room at a late hour could very well have meant she was consenting to sex. If that's the case, his thinking explains his actions, but it doesn't excuse them.
Comment