You really are a hater, it was a non-title fight ******, that's why WBC invented the diamond belt specifically for this fight!!! Pac never forced Cotto for the fight, Pac initially want's it at 143-144lbs. with Cotto's WW belt on the line, BUT Cotto declined then they finally settled for 145lbs. with no belt, it was all for the money and Cotto was never at a disadvantage for this fight...
What's the difference
Collapse
-
-
It was for the WBO WW title that Cotto won in the Jennings fight and it was on the line for Pac , how do you get non title fight ? , and Manny forced him to 145 or it was NO FIGHT , now thats called intellectual pressure , same boss Arum leaned on Cotto to accept it , Cottos leaves Arum and Manny has since refused to fight Cotto without a CW , you dont have to be Einstein to see through the Pac BS .You really are a hater, it was a non-title fight ******, that's why WBC invented the diamond belt specifically for this fight!!! Pac never forced Cotto for the fight, Pac initially want's it at 143-144lbs. with Cotto's WW belt on the line, BUT Cotto declined then they finally settled for 145lbs. with no belt, it was all for the money and Cotto was never at a disadvantage for this fight...
Totally different to Ward Dawson , and dont call hater just because the facts are stated .Comment
-
The difference is, Pac won titles like that. Pac is a former 154 lbs champion, yet he refuses to fight at that weight.In Ward's win over Dawson and Pacquiao's catch weight fights?
Both fighter's wanted to go down in weight and Pacquiao has been labeled as a drainer.
I'm confused, because some of the same people who're saying weight had nothing to do with Ward's victory are the same ones who say Pacquiao only won certain fights because he drained people.
It was only like a week or two ago the boards were filled with Pacquiao and his draining tactics.Comment
-
Man Pac-Cotto was BS because it was only put in to hurt Cotto. Period. I mean come on Pac fought Oscar at 147 but he cant fight Cotto at 147. Bytch move.
Why have it at all? Think about it. What was the point?Comment
-
-
No he doesn't deserve more credit he took on the number ranked guy at 175 at 168, he should have took Dawson on for his 175 title, fighting a guy ranked number 1 at 175 but in your own lower division is not the same.
If Dawson was ranked number 1 on the p4p list it would be different.
I still think Ward beats Dawson at 175, but this is not a good look should have fought for Dawsons belt so people can't take anything away from his win and fight a healthy dawson.Comment
-
I'd like you to tell me who are these (both) fighters that wanted to come down in weight 1st & foremost.In Ward's win over Dawson and Pacquiao's catch weight fights?
Both fighter's wanted to go down in weight and Pacquiao has been labeled as a drainer.
I'm confused, because some of the same people who're saying weight had nothing to do with Ward's victory are the same ones who say Pacquiao only won certain fights because he drained people.
It was only like a week or two ago the boards were filled with Pacquiao and his draining tactics.Comment
-
Comment
Comment