need we go on?
Comments Thread For: Wach To Bail on W. Klitschko Fight Over "Slave Terms?"
Collapse
-
Comment
-
To all the people who said Haye was lying when he talked about the same damn thing : what do you have to say now?
I can understand a rematch clause but a "fight my big brother" clause? Come on now.Comment
-
Chisora and Warren lied too when they confirmed the rematch clauses were in the contract.Comment
-
A rematch clause is proper to include in a contract. But to basically become Klitschko property for 3 fights, as a world champion, is ridiculous.
It was wrong when Don King was doing it and it's wrong now. I don't blame Wach for telling them to suck it.Comment
-
It couldn't have been that big of an issue because he has already agreed with the terms. And the terms will never become an issue because Wach won't win. Just as Haye and who ever else has complained about the way business was done.Comment
-
Ridiculous isn't it?
No other top fighters in the sport would get away with offering these awful contracts to their opponents, but K2.
Having said that, Wach is glorified Tomato can with no drawing power. What they're offering is far & away a career high payday. He needs to accept the offer, take his beating and his career high earnings and fade into Bolivian somewhere.Comment
Comment