Pacquiao v Berto

[IronDanHamza]

Like i said i'd pick Manny to win but it would be no walk in the park

This fight would be the epitome of a walk in the park.

If there was a ever a fight that's a walk in the park, Pacquaio-Berto would be it.

Berto is so far from Pacquaio's level it's funny.

[Weebler I]

Pac thanks you for the way you think..But for me I want to see him do it..He wants to KO Bradley(oh really)he wants to leave no doubt this time...Then he turns around and signs to fight Marquez(this will most likely happen)...Bradley is the best option for Pac at 147lb unless we talking about May or Cotto moving down...

It's nothing to do with what Pac thinks, it's to do with what most neutral boxing fans think. They want to see a new and exciting fight. We've just watched the Pac v Bradley movie and it just wasn't that good that you'd watch it again - same goes for Marquez and Cotto.

Let's see Berto or someone else new in there giving it a lash.

[IronDanHamza]

It's nothing to do with what Pac thinks, it's to do with what most neutral boxing fans think. They want to see an exciting fight. We've just watched the Pac v Bradley movie and it just wasn't that good that you'd watch it again - same goes for Marquez and Cotto.

Let's see Berto or someone else new in there giving it a lash.

I'd rather Bradley.

Bradley atleast brings things to the table, he atleast has skills, and a style.

I'd rather Berto fight someone more on his level, like Kell Brook.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Come on man, no neutral wants to see a rematch. It was good for 4 rounds and boring for 8. Bradley should take his "win" and keep it moving.

Hold on,it was you who described Bradley's ring generalship as running was it not??Oh boy..No wonder you did not like that fight,too much actual skill on display...Hey check it out,MMA is right there for ya bro(not saying what MMA fighters do is not skill just a diferent kinda skill is all)Boxing is about skill and out thinking your opponent..Yes a war break out at times but that's not what Boxing is about...There is nothing better then a high speed chess match bro,which was exactly what Pac Bradley was..

[Rome-By-Ko]

It's nothing to do with what Pac thinks, it's to do with what most neutral boxing fans think. They want to see a new and exciting fight. We've just watched the Pac v Bradley movie and it just wasn't that good that you'd watch it again - same goes for Marquez and Cotto.

Let's see Berto or someone else new in there giving it a lash.

It was'int??You speak for the whole boxing community??I doubt it..

Dude it was a good fight,down playing that fact is just horrible..That fight was better then Pac Cotto Pac Mosley Pac Marga's Pac Hatton,and right on par with Pac JMM 3..There is nobody else at 147lb at this moment who even deserves a shot over Bradley...If Pac went and took on a fighter of Berto or even Guerrero's caliber he would be a true laughing stock..Like I said Bradley the best option unless Floyd or Cotto come threw at 147lb or Pac moves up...

[Weebler I]

I'd rather Bradley.

Bradley atleast brings things to the table, he atleast has skills, and a style.

I'd rather Berto fight someone more on his level, like Kell Brook.

Some strong Berto hate from you in this thread Dan. I don't really like Berto since he failed a drugs test but he is an exciting fighter and I think you underrate him to a degree.

Honestly just want to see Pacquiao fight someone new in and around 147lbs, given the lack of energy around a Cotto, Marquez or Bradley rematch I think most boxing fans feel the same.

Hold on,it was you who described Bradley's ring generalship as running was it not??Oh boy..No wonder you did not like that fight,too much actual skill on display...Hey check it out,MMA is right there for ya bro(not saying what MMA fighters do is not skill just a diferent kinda skill is all)Boxing is about skill and out thinking your opponent..Yes a war break out at times but that's not what Boxing is about...There is nothing better then a high speed chess match bro,which was exactly what Pac Bradley was..

Pac v Bradley was okay to watch once, but not again, it just wasn't that good.

[RightStraight]

Berto would hurt Pacquiao. I'm not sure about Berto nowadays, he's been inactive for a year now, I don't know if he's switched things up but...I say Berto would give Pacquiao a problem.


Speaking of new fights, why not Guerrero/Berto or Berto/Bradley 147?

[dan_cov]

At this stage I'd go with Berto too stop Pacquaio.
Too big, too strong.

Legit power in both hands, hes not slow at the feet either.

I understand the hate but I legitimately feel he would shock the world & it wouldn't be particularly competitive. I really do think he'd steamroll Pacquaio, absolutely flatten him.

[IronDanHamza]

Some strong Berto hate from you in this thread Dan. I don't really like Berto since he failed a drugs test but he is an exciting fighter and I think you underrate him to a degree.

Honestly just want to see Pacquiao fight someone new in and around 147lbs..

I understand what you're saying. But, Berto's just not on that level.

I don't even hate the guy, just don't rate him, at all. He's done nothing for me to believe otherwise. Lost clearly to Ortiz, should have lost to Collazo in my eyes and in the eyes of most, looked like **** against Zaveck and Quintana. They're pretty much the only good fighters he's fought and he's looked awful in all of them.

I don't see why I should rate him. Nothing about him apart from his speed is impressive to me. He has no skills, no defense and doesn't even really have a style.

Pacquaio would slaughter him, if he somehow got past the first 6 rounds he'd just take a career threatening beating.

I'm not too hyped about a Bradley or Marquez rematch but I'll take those over a Berto fight any day of the week. Both are clearly far superior to Berto.

[Fay]

Pacquiao ducked Berto last year..he fought a 48 year old mosley instead
I still think Pacquiao beats him though..