Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #61
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    I don't know where you've been but I think you'll find that most consider Round 1 to be one of the rounds that could have been scored to Bradley.

    And most also feel Pacquaio won 7 clearly.

    Perhaps it's the one person going around calling everyone else ******ed that is the one that's actually ******ed.

    I mean, you're actually calling other people biased and having agendas.
    you remember rd 6 in floyd vs cotto? i said floyd got hurt, you said "when?"
    day later or somethin you're going around repeating my words basically

    i watch boxing matches, seems you lot skim through this stuff
    timothy didn't win rd 1, and rd 7 was not a clear pacquiao rd

    and thinking back to the commentary in atleast rd 1(kellerman saying "uhh, semes kinda close, ya know.. ehh", i can see why people are always bit.ching about how commentating swayed their decisions, ya'll sheep

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #62
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      I may be getting mixed up. I'm going off memory.

      I know I scored the round for Pacqauio though.

      I scored all of rounds 3-9 for Pacquaio.
      Check out the clip though, really tough round to score.

      Comment

      • Bushbaby
        Wild Apache
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 23513
        • 727
        • 370
        • 32,078

        #63
        Rounds 1-2-10-11-12 for Bradley. Pacman 7-5 being generous in favor of Pacman in all close rounds.

        Comment

        • New England
          Strong champion.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 37514
          • 1,926
          • 1,486
          • 97,173

          #64
          Originally posted by HeroBando
          Rounds are not scored in 1 min segments. A minute is plenty to catch up with 2 mins of marginal work. Heck seconds may do.

          if you hit hard enough you can win the balance of a round with one shot

          hell, you can take a whipping for 2 mins and fifty and land a clean shot in the final seconds that ends the fight.



          scoring a boxing match is inherently subjective. there are no right answers in close rounds.

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #65
            Originally posted by Defututus
            and are you ******ed? rd 7 was alot closer than rd's 1 and 2(1 esspecially being fairly obvious pacquiao rd)

            you people have to be trollin, seems this site really has gone down the shi.tter.
            everyones a little bit.ch with an agenda on here now, let me guess, you picked bradley to win, let me guess, you're a little spoiled brat who can't own up and accept he was wrong, bradley lost, get over it
            I'm not trolling at all, rounds 1 and 2 are clear Bradley rounds in my opinion, I honestly, after re-watching the fight for as many times as I did, see a case for Pacquiao winning those rounds.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 49445
              • 5,022
              • 269
              • 104,043

              #66
              Originally posted by Defututus
              you remember rd 6 in floyd vs cotto? i said floyd got hurt, you said "when?"
              day later or somethin you're going around repeating my words basically
              Do you have a quote of that? I don't recall saying that.

              I can't remember but I'm sure when you said that Mayweather was hurt at the start of round 6, I replied with; I noticed that also. (Paraphrasing)

              Correct me If I'm wrong, feel free to quote me.

              I mean, it could well of been something I didn't notice that I went on to notice on a second watch. So please, quote me or even just link me to that thread.

              Originally posted by Defututus
              i watch boxing matches, seems you lot skim through this stuff
              timothy didn't win rd 1, and rd 7 was not a clear pacquiao rd


              Originally posted by Defututus
              and thinking back to the commentary in atleast rd 1(kellerman saying "uhh, semes kinda close, ya know.. ehh", i can see why people are always bit.ching about how commentating swayed their decisions, ya'll sheep
              I have never watched the HBO Broadcast other than the video someone made on their alleged bias so that point is moot.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49445
                • 5,022
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #67
                Originally posted by Dominicano Soy
                Check out the clip though, really tough round to score.
                Just watched it. Interesting.

                I still scored it for Pacquaio though without commentary.

                Think I'm getting round 5 mixed up with 7.

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #68
                  Originally posted by SoggyLungs
                  pac landed like 4 or 5 punches..

                  If your counting those punches then you should also count the ones like that for Bradley..BTW I gave Pac rd 4...

                  Comment

                  • Rome-By-Ko
                    The winner Is
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 20157
                    • 323
                    • 332
                    • 29,833

                    #69
                    Rds 1-3 are Bradley's imo..4-8 are Pac's and 9-10 are Bradleys..Now rd 9 7 3 11 are up for debate..Very close rds,the rest imo are not...

                    Comment

                    • lefthook2daliva
                      huh?
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 5574
                      • 191
                      • 599
                      • 18,317

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Oh you out son
                      since when is throwing a solid jab winning a fight. most of those jabs were not solid either, and the vast majority of them were hitting pac on the gloves. whenever bradley got hit with a power shot (which was at least 2-3 each round) he clearly felt it, backed up, and stopped trying to trade.

                      i am not a pac fan, i am fully confident that floyd would beat him if they fought at any point in their careers
                      I fixed what needed fixin', but yeah.

                      I'm in no way shape or form any kind of Pac fan (can't stand most of the rabid ones) and was bigtime on the Bradley bandwagon goin' into this **** but what's right is right.

                      Pac got robbed (assuming he wasn't in on it, too).

                      If Bradley is gonna' rematch Pac it would be better for Tim to let JMM beat on Manny some more (whether Marquez gets the "W" or not) and then stall for another year.

                      By that time Pac may have slowed down enough for Tim to get a legit win.
                      Last edited by lefthook2daliva; 07-03-2012, 05:51 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP