Comments Thread For: Pacquiao vs. Bradley: WBO's Investigation Documents

[J Dubb II 330]

Tim did nothing? Yet out threw Manny???? So What your saying is Manny did nothing

[CHOWWOKKA]

Other way around. Floyd got beat up and won by decision. Does the name "Castillo" ring a bell?

Floyd didn't beat up Castillo and then get robbed??

Before you reply, take a look at what the other guy posted....

[mathed]

no it dont. it only shows what little Bradley did do. Some parts over and over. Anyone can look good in a video showing only good shots thrown by one fighter. Its funny how it only took up so little space on the video. Yet Manny took the entire fight. 3min rounds for 12 rounds. Now thats a video. That shows what every expert in boxing saw. Bradley getting out classed round by round. Dont stoop to made up vids to make a fighter LOOK like he won...its beneath you Mat

Nah man, it shows how the HBO crew were giving Pac credit for shots he missed, and how Tim was sticking Manny right and left but no one wanted or was able to see the truth. I had Pac winning by 2 rounds, that 10-2 stuff was nonsense. This just goes to show you that if the HBO "expert" analysts thought they saw something that wasn't really happening, then the human compubox operators can and are likely just as faulty and incompetent.

Just because it appears that something landed, doesn't mean that it really did. Just because the crowd yells and screams, it doesn't mean it is a reflection of what truly happened. If someone takes over 200 shots from Manny Pacquiao, they are going to look like Cotto and Margs did, Bradley looked like he barely took any damage.

Manny was taking most of the rounds off too man....you don't win rounds by coasting.

My main point is that Lampley doesn't really know shizzle. I can admit that I thought Pac took the fight, but not the way most are saying he did and not by the amount that people are saying he did.

[Jam Jars]

At least 1 of the WBO judges scored the round for Bradley in 7 of the rounds. At least 2 in 5 of the rounds. The WBO judges knew that most people thought Pacquiao won and that would have been on their mind while scoring too. Taking in all this my conclusion is, it was a close fight and Pac fans can go **** themselves.

[ronnie_N.]

bradley got the w, the belt, the phat paycheck... but with all the criticisms, i think he can capitalize on this and its best for him to play straight an all-out villain role... people will be mad and they will foolishly pay to see him lose... just like what floyd did.. but in fairness to floyd, he got tremendous talent compared to bradley...

[Jcsuper]

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 1

um...we all care what you think...Not.....heheheheheheheheeeeee

says the guy who make this account two months after de Pac-De la Hoya fight...

I bet you werent even a boxing fan before Pac was a boxer so stop acting like you're a bada ss. Btw even if he's new on this site and have a life and dont post 1000 posts per day like the no-life you are don't mean his opinion isn't valuable

[ellobo]

I can believe the amount of here people not wanting a change in boxing full of corruptions. If you are really a fan of this sport why you all are acting like this? If Pac the biggest star in boxing got robbed what else some other boxers can do whose career under the hands of those corrupt judges, refs and promoters.

Change is difficult for most....

[lacson]

Is it me or does anyone not have a problem with all of this, there have been worse robberies this year alone and no one cares, but pacqiao loses a close fight and theres a damn inquest smh

That's the point it's Pacquiao. And the next point it's not a close fight.

Those are the relevant points.

[imakaiw]

Keith Kizer, you have no more credibility to run NSAC. Thank you for resigning.

[imakaiw]

01samuelc, it is your head. It could be malfunctioning.